Literature DB >> 29390806

Theoretical restrictions on longest implicit time scales in Markov state models of biomolecular dynamics.

Anton V Sinitskiy1, Vijay S Pande1.   

Abstract

Markov state models (MSMs) have been widely used to analyze computer simulations of various biomolecular systems. They can capture conformational transitions much slower than an average or maximal length of a single molecular dynamics (MD) trajectory from the set of trajectories used to build the MSM. A rule of thumb claiming that the slowest implicit time scale captured by an MSM should be comparable by the order of magnitude to the aggregate duration of all MD trajectories used to build this MSM has been known in the field. However, this rule has never been formally proved. In this work, we present analytical results for the slowest time scale in several types of MSMs, supporting the above rule. We conclude that the slowest implicit time scale equals the product of the aggregate sampling and four factors that quantify: (1) how much statistics on the conformational transitions corresponding to the longest implicit time scale is available, (2) how good the sampling of the destination Markov state is, (3) the gain in statistics from using a sliding window for counting transitions between Markov states, and (4) a bias in the estimate of the implicit time scale arising from finite sampling of the conformational transitions. We demonstrate that in many practically important cases all these four factors are on the order of unity, and we analyze possible scenarios that could lead to their significant deviation from unity. Overall, we provide for the first time analytical results on the slowest time scales captured by MSMs. These results can guide further practical applications of MSMs to biomolecular dynamics and allow for higher computational efficiency of simulations.

Year:  2018        PMID: 29390806      PMCID: PMC5786450          DOI: 10.1063/1.5005058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  36 in total

1.  Estimation and uncertainty of reversible Markov models.

Authors:  Benjamin Trendelkamp-Schroer; Hao Wu; Fabian Paul; Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Probability distributions of molecular observables computed from Markov models.

Authors:  Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Kyle A Beauchamp; George Boxer; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Constructing multi-resolution Markov State Models (MSMs) to elucidate RNA hairpin folding mechanisms.

Authors:  Xuhui Huang; Yuan Yao; Gregory R Bowman; Jian Sun; Leonidas J Guibas; Gunnar Carlsson; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2010

5.  Simulating the T-jump-triggered unfolding dynamics of trpzip2 peptide and its time-resolved IR and two-dimensional IR signals using the Markov state model approach.

Authors:  Wei Zhuang; Raymond Z Cui; Daniel-Adriano Silva; Xuhui Huang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Markov state model reveals folding and functional dynamics in ultra-long MD trajectories.

Authors:  Thomas J Lane; Gregory R Bowman; Kyle Beauchamp; Vincent A Voelz; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask.

Authors:  Vijay S Pande; Kyle Beauchamp; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-01

9.  Using Markov models to simulate electron spin resonance spectra from molecular dynamics trajectories.

Authors:  Deniz Sezer; Jack H Freed; Benoit Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Protein conformational plasticity and complex ligand-binding kinetics explored by atomistic simulations and Markov models.

Authors:  Nuria Plattner; Frank Noé
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Computer Simulations Predict High Structural Heterogeneity of Functional State of NMDA Receptors.

Authors:  Anton V Sinitskiy; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  RNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview.

Authors:  Jiří Šponer; Giovanni Bussi; Miroslav Krepl; Pavel Banáš; Sandro Bottaro; Richard A Cunha; Alejandro Gil-Ley; Giovanni Pinamonti; Simón Poblete; Petr Jurečka; Nils G Walter; Michal Otyepka
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.