Literature DB >> 29178137

Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.

Jürgen Haas1,2, Alessandro Barbato1,2, Dario Behringer1,2, Gabriel Studer1,2, Steven Roth1,2, Martino Bertoni1,2, Khaled Mostaguir1,2, Rafal Gumienny1,2, Torsten Schwede1,2.   

Abstract

Every second year, the community experiment "Critical Assessment of Techniques for Structure Prediction" (CASP) is conducting an independent blind assessment of structure prediction methods, providing a framework for comparing the performance of different approaches and discussing the latest developments in the field. Yet, developers of automated computational modeling methods clearly benefit from more frequent evaluations based on larger sets of data. The "Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO)" platform complements the CASP experiment by conducting fully automated blind prediction assessments based on the weekly pre-release of sequences of those structures, which are going to be published in the next release of the PDB Protein Data Bank. CAMEO publishes weekly benchmarking results based on models collected during a 4-day prediction window, on average assessing ca. 100 targets during a time frame of 5 weeks. CAMEO benchmarking data is generated consistently for all participating methods at the same point in time, enabling developers to benchmark and cross-validate their method's performance, and directly refer to the benchmarking results in publications. In order to facilitate server development and promote shorter release cycles, CAMEO sends weekly email with submission statistics and low performance warnings. Many participants of CASP have successfully employed CAMEO when preparing their methods for upcoming community experiments. CAMEO offers a variety of scores to allow benchmarking diverse aspects of structure prediction methods. By introducing new scoring schemes, CAMEO facilitates new development in areas of active research, for example, modeling quaternary structure, complexes, or ligand binding sites.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAMEO; CASP; benchmarking; continuous evaluation; ligand binding site accuracy; model confidence; model quality assessment; oligomeric assessment; protein structure modeling; protein structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29178137      PMCID: PMC5820194          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  55 in total

1.  MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality.

Authors:  N Siew; A Elofsson; L Rychlewski; D Fischer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods.

Authors:  J Moult; J T Pedersen; R Judson; K Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-11

3.  VoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-03-24

4.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-01

5.  RBO Aleph: leveraging novel information sources for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mabrouk; Ines Putz; Tim Werner; Michael Schneider; Moritz Neeb; Philipp Bartels; Oliver Brock
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Increased efficiency of Campylobacter jejuni N-oligosaccharyltransferase PglB by structure-guided engineering.

Authors:  Julian Ihssen; Jürgen Haas; Michael Kowarik; Luzia Wiesli; Michael Wacker; Torsten Schwede; Linda Thöny-Meyer
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.411

7.  The Protein Model Portal--a comprehensive resource for protein structure and model information.

Authors:  Juergen Haas; Steven Roth; Konstantin Arnold; Florian Kiefer; Tobias Schmidt; Lorenza Bordoli; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  ProQ2: estimation of model accuracy implemented in Rosetta.

Authors:  Karolis Uziela; Björn Wallner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis.

Authors:  Lawrence A Kelley; Stefans Mezulis; Christopher M Yates; Mark N Wass; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  The ModFOLD4 server for the quality assessment of 3D protein models.

Authors:  Liam J McGuffin; Maria T Buenavista; Daniel B Roche
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  38 in total

1.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XII.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-12-15

2.  I-TASSER gateway: A protein structure and function prediction server powered by XSEDE.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Chengxin Zhang; Eric W Bell; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Future Gener Comput Syst       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 7.187

3.  Comparative analysis of methods for evaluation of protein models against native structures.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Practical Considerations for Atomistic Structure Modeling with Cryo-EM Maps.

Authors:  Doo Nam Kim; Dominik Gront; Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Ivan Anishchenko; Hahnbeom Park; Zhenling Peng; Sergey Ovchinnikov; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  VoroMQA web server for assessing three-dimensional structures of proteins and protein complexes.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Continuous Evaluation of Ligand Protein Predictions: A Weekly Community Challenge for Drug Docking.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Wagner; Christopher P Churas; Shuai Liu; Robert V Swift; Michael Chiu; Chenghua Shao; Victoria A Feher; Stephen K Burley; Michael K Gilson; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Estimation of model accuracy in CASP13.

Authors:  Jianlin Cheng; Myong-Ho Choe; Arne Elofsson; Kun-Sop Han; Jie Hou; Ali H A Maghrabi; Liam J McGuffin; David Menéndez-Hurtado; Kliment Olechnovič; Torsten Schwede; Gabriel Studer; Karolis Uziela; Česlovas Venclovas; Björn Wallner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-07-16

9.  Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP13.

Authors:  Dmytro Guzenko; Aleix Lafita; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Jose M Duarte
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-27

10.  Alzheimer's Disease: The Role of Mutations in Protein Folding.

Authors:  Eleftheria Polychronidou; Antigoni Avramouli; Panayiotis Vlamos
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.