Literature DB >> 19714774

Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions.

Domenico Cozzetto1, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Anna Tramontano.   

Abstract

The model quality assessment problem consists in the a priori estimation of the overall and per-residue accuracy of protein structure predictions. Over the past years, a number of methods have been developed to address this issue and CASP established a prediction category to evaluate their performance in 2006. In 2008 the experiment was repeated and its results are reported here. Participants were invited to infer the correctness of the protein models submitted by the registered automatic servers. Estimates could apply to both whole models and individual amino acids. Groups involved in the tertiary structure prediction categories were also asked to assign local error estimates to each predicted residue in their own models and their results are also discussed here. The correlation between the predicted and observed correctness measures was the basis of the assessment of the results. We observe that consensus-based methods still perform significantly better than those accepting single models, similarly to what was concluded in the previous edition of the experiment. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19714774     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  36 in total

1.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XII.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-12-15

2.  Fast geometric consensus approach for protein model quality assessment.

Authors:  Rafal Adamczak; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Brinda K Vallat; Jaroslaw Meller
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Krzysztof Fidelis; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-09-08

4.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-01

5.  Disease risk of missense mutations using structural inference from predicted function.

Authors:  Jeremy A Horst; Kai Wang; Orapin V Horst; Michael L Cunningham; Ram Samudrala
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.272

6.  Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP13: Challenges in the era of deep learning.

Authors:  Jonghun Won; Minkyung Baek; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-30

7.  Assessment of template-based protein structure predictions in CASP10.

Authors:  Yuanpeng J Huang; Binchen Mao; James M Aramini; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

8.  NEW MDS AND CLUSTERING BASED ALGORITHMS FOR PROTEIN MODEL QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION.

Authors:  Qingguo Wang; Charles Shang; Dong Xu; Yi Shang
Journal:  Int J Artif Intell Tools       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 1.208

9.  Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservation.

Authors:  Matan Kalman; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Methods of model accuracy estimation can help selecting the best models from decoy sets: Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP11.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Alessandro Barbato; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Krzysztof Fidelis; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.