Literature DB >> 28900792

Relative binding affinity prediction of farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 using FEP.

Christina Schindler1, Friedrich Rippmann2, Daniel Kuhn2.   

Abstract

Physics-based free energy simulations have increasingly become an important tool for predicting binding affinity and the recent introduction of automated protocols has also paved the way towards a more widespread use in the pharmaceutical industry. The D3R 2016 Grand Challenge 2 provided an opportunity to blindly test the commercial free energy calculation protocol FEP+ and assess its performance relative to other affinity prediction methods. The present D3R free energy prediction challenge was built around two experimental data sets involving inhibitors of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) which is a promising anticancer drug target. The FXR binding site is predominantly hydrophobic with few conserved interaction motifs and strong induced fit effects making it a challenging target for molecular modeling and drug design. For both data sets, we achieved reasonable prediction accuracy (RMSD ≈ 1.4 kcal/mol, rank 3-4 according to RMSD out of 20 submissions) comparable to that of state-of-the-art methods in the field. Our D3R results boosted our confidence in the method and strengthen our desire to expand its applications in future in-house drug design projects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding affinity prediction; Computer-aided drug design; D3R; Drug design data resource; Free energy calculations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28900792     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-017-0064-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  22 in total

1.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald.

Authors:  Romelia Salomon-Ferrer; Andreas W Götz; Duncan Poole; Scott Le Grand; Ross C Walker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Yujie Wu; Yuqing Deng; Byungchan Kim; Levi Pierce; Goran Krilov; Dmitry Lupyan; Shaughnessy Robinson; Markus K Dahlgren; Jeremy Greenwood; Donna L Romero; Craig Masse; Jennifer L Knight; Thomas Steinbrecher; Thijs Beuming; Wolfgang Damm; Ed Harder; Woody Sherman; Mark Brewer; Ron Wester; Mark Murcko; Leah Frye; Ramy Farid; Teng Lin; David L Mobley; William L Jorgensen; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Robert Abel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  A Python tool to set up relative free energy calculations in GROMACS.

Authors:  Pavel V Klimovich; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Application of Free Energy Perturbation for the Design of BACE1 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Myriam Ciordia; Laura Pérez-Benito; Francisca Delgado; Andrés A Trabanco; Gary Tresadern
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-01

6.  Qgui: A high-throughput interface for automated setup and analysis of free energy calculations and empirical valence bond simulations in biological systems.

Authors:  Geir Villy Isaksen; Tor Arne Heim Andberg; Johan Åqvist; Bjørn Olav Brandsdal
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.518

7.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  OpenMM 4: A Reusable, Extensible, Hardware Independent Library for High Performance Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Peter Eastman; Mark S Friedrichs; John D Chodera; Randall J Radmer; Christopher M Bruns; Joy P Ku; Kyle A Beauchamp; Thomas J Lane; Lee-Ping Wang; Diwakar Shukla; Tony Tye; Mike Houston; Timo Stich; Christoph Klein; Michael R Shirts; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Calculation of the relative change in binding free energy of a protein-inhibitor complex.

Authors:  P A Bash; U C Singh; F K Brown; R Langridge; P A Kollman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Farnesoid X receptor is essential for normal glucose homeostasis.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Pradip K Saha; Lawrence Chan; David D Moore
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  4 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Improving small molecule virtual screening strategies for the next generation of therapeutics.

Authors:  Bentley M Wingert; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  D3R grand challenge 4: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Conor D Parks; Zied Gaieb; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; W Patrick Walters; Johanna M Jansen; Georgia McGaughey; Richard A Lewis; Scott D Bembenek; Michael K Ameriks; Tara Mirzadegan; Stephen K Burley; Rommie E Amaro; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Application of Various Molecular Modelling Methods in the Study of Estrogens and Xenoestrogens.

Authors:  Anna Helena Mazurek; Łukasz Szeleszczuk; Thomas Simonson; Dariusz Maciej Pisklak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.