Literature DB >> 11588250

Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

D Baker1, A Sali.   

Abstract

Genome sequencing projects are producing linear amino acid sequences, but full understanding of the biological role of these proteins will require knowledge of their structure and function. Although experimental structure determination methods are providing high-resolution structure information about a subset of the proteins, computational structure prediction methods will provide valuable information for the large fraction of sequences whose structures will not be determined experimentally. The first class of protein structure prediction methods, including threading and comparative modeling, rely on detectable similarity spanning most of the modeled sequence and at least one known structure. The second class of methods, de novo or ab initio methods, predict the structure from sequence alone, without relying on similarity at the fold level between the modeled sequence and any of the known structures. In this Viewpoint, we begin by describing the essential features of the methods, the accuracy of the models, and their application to the prediction and understanding of protein function, both for single proteins and on the scale of whole genomes. We then discuss the important role that protein structure prediction methods play in the growing worldwide effort in structural genomics.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11588250     DOI: 10.1126/science.1065659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  493 in total

1.  Statistical potentials for fold assessment.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Roberto Sánchez; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models.

Authors:  Ursula Pieper; Narayanan Eswar; Ashley C Stuart; Valentin A Ilyin; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Structural genomics: a pipeline for providing structures for the biologist.

Authors:  Mark R Chance; Anne R Bresnick; Stephen K Burley; Jian-Sheng Jiang; Christopher D Lima; Andrej Sali; Steven C Almo; Jeffrey B Bonanno; John A Buglino; Simon Boulton; Hua Chen; Narayanan Eswar; Guoshun He; Raymond Huang; Valentin Ilyin; Linda McMahan; Ursula Pieper; Soumya Ray; Marc Vidal; Li Kai Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison.

Authors:  Angel R Ortiz; Charlie E M Strauss; Osvaldo Olmea
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Discovering protein similarity using natural language processing.

Authors:  Indra N Sarkar; Thomas C Rindflesch
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

6.  Improving threading algorithms for remote homology modeling by combining fragment and template comparisons.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-07

7.  Protein loop closure using orientational restraints from NMR data.

Authors:  Chittaranjan Tripathy; Jianyang Zeng; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-12-13

8.  Coordinating the impact of structural genomics on the human α-helical transmembrane proteome.

Authors:  Ursula Pieper; Avner Schlessinger; Edda Kloppmann; Geoffrey A Chang; James J Chou; Mark E Dumont; Brian G Fox; Petra Fromme; Wayne A Hendrickson; Michael G Malkowski; Douglas C Rees; David L Stokes; Michael H B Stowell; Michael C Wiener; Burkhard Rost; Robert M Stroud; Raymond C Stevens; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Solvent accessible surface area approximations for rapid and accurate protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Durham; Brent Dorr; Nils Woetzel; René Staritzbichler; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Homology modeling of human alpha 1 beta 2 gamma 2 and house fly beta 3 GABA receptor channels and Surflex-docking of fipronil.

Authors:  Jin Cheng; Xiu-Lian Ju; Xiang-Yang Chen; Gen-Yan Liu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 1.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.