Literature DB >> 27061359

American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2015: MRI assessments of cartilage mechanics, morphology and composition following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Jarred Kaiser1, Michael F Vignos1, Fang Liu2, Richard Kijowski3, Darryl G Thelen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is currently unknown. The study purpose was to leverage recent advances in quantitative and dynamic MRI to test the hypothesis that abnormal joint mechanics within four years of reconstruction is accompanied by evidence of early compositional changes in cartilage.
METHODS: Static MR imaging was performed bilaterally on eleven subjects with an ACL reconstruction (1-4years post-surgery) and on twelve healthy subjects to obtain tibial cartilage thickness maps. Quantitative imaging (mcDESPOT) was performed unilaterally on all subjects to assess the fraction of bound water in the tibial plateau cartilage. Finally, volumetric dynamic imaging was performed to assess cartilage contact patterns during an active knee flexion-extension task. A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to test for the effects of surgical reconstruction and location on cartilage thickness, bound water fractions, and contact across the medial and lateral tibia plateaus.
FINDINGS: No significant differences in cartilage thickness were found between groups. However, there was a significant reduction in the fraction of water bound by proteoglycan in the ACL reconstructed knees, most notably along the anterior portion of the medial plateau and the weight-bearing lateral plateau. During movement, reconstructed knees exhibited greater contact along the medial spine in the medial plateau and along the posterior aspect of the lateral plateau, when compared with their healthy contralateral knees and healthy controls.
INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence that abnormal mechanics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees are present coincidently with early biomarkers of cartilage degeneration.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Biomarkers; Biomechanics; Cartilage; Dynamic MRI; Thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27061359      PMCID: PMC4851865          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  51 in total

1.  Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important?

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Travis Maak; Volker Musahl; Musa Citak; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; Daniel Choi; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Long-term results after primary repair or non-surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a randomized study with a 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  A Meunier; M Odensten; L Good
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of 3-dimensional in vivo tibiofemoral kinematics in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees.

Authors:  R Dana Carpenter; Sharmila Majumdar; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Cartilage in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: MR imaging T1{rho} and T2--initial experience with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Daniel Kuo; Alexander Theologis; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Christoph Stehling; Thomas M Link; C Benjamin Ma; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Differences in tibial rotation during walking in ACL reconstructed and healthy contralateral knees.

Authors:  Sean F Scanlan; Ajit M W Chaudhari; Chris O Dyrby; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Automatic determination of anatomical coordinate systems for three-dimensional bone models of the isolated human knee.

Authors:  Daniel L Miranda; Michael J Rainbow; Evan L Leventhal; Joseph J Crisco; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Quantitative MR imaging evaluation of the cartilage thickness and subchondral bone area in patients with ACL-reconstructions 7 years after surgery.

Authors:  G Andreisek; L M White; M S Sussman; M Kunz; M Hurtig; I Weller; J Essue; P Marks; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Differences in the radiological characteristics between post-traumatic and non-traumatic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  P Swärd; I Kostogiannis; P Neuman; A Von Porat; T Boegård; H Roos
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  The feasibility of characterizing the spatial distribution of cartilage T(2) using texture analysis.

Authors:  G Blumenkrantz; R Stahl; J Carballido-Gamio; S Zhao; Y Lu; T Munoz; M-P Hellio Le Graverand-Gastineau; S K Jain; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Displacement encoding for the measurement of cartilage deformation.

Authors:  Corey P Neu; Jeffrey H Walton
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  10 in total

1.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Combined Injury to the ACL and Lateral Meniscus Alters the Geometry of Articular Cartilage and Meniscus Soon After Initial Trauma.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Niccolo Fiorentino; Mack Gardner-Morse; Timothy W Tourville; James R Slauterbeck; Daniel R Sturnick; Erin C Argentieri; Carl W Imhauser
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Analysis of in-vivo articular cartilage contact surface of the knee during a step-up motion.

Authors:  Peng Yin; Jing-Sheng Li; Willem A Kernkamp; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Seung-Hoon Baek; Ali Hosseini; Lin Lin; Peifu Tang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Quantitative knee cartilage measurement at MR imaging of patients with anterior cruciate ligament tear.

Authors:  Kazuki Kato; Tamotsu Kamishima; Eiji Kondo; Tomohiro Onodera; Shota Ichikawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-08-18

Review 6.  Arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Steven P Daniels; Jelle P van der List; J Jacob Kazam; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A Prospective Observational Study on Short-Term Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair of Proximal Tears Using Knotless Single Suture Anchor Technique.

Authors:  Jojin Jose Chitten; Manit Arora
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 1.033

8.  Knee joint biomechanics during gait improve from 3 to 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kelsey Neal; Jack R Williams; Abdulmajeed Alfayyadh; Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Kurt Manal; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.102

9.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Accuracy of model-based tracking of knee kinematics and cartilage contact measured by dynamic volumetric MRI.

Authors:  Jarred Kaiser; Arezu Monawer; Rajeev Chaudhary; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.242

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.