Literature DB >> 20167324

Automatic determination of anatomical coordinate systems for three-dimensional bone models of the isolated human knee.

Daniel L Miranda1, Michael J Rainbow, Evan L Leventhal, Joseph J Crisco, Braden C Fleming.   

Abstract

The combination of three-dimensional (3-D) models with dual fluoroscopy is increasingly popular for evaluating joint function in vivo. Applying these modalities to study knee motion with high accuracy requires reliable anatomical coordinate systems (ACSs) for the femur and tibia. Therefore, a robust method for creating ACSs from 3-D models of the femur and tibia is required. We present and evaluate an automated method for constructing ACSs for the distal femur and proximal tibia based solely on 3-D bone models. The algorithm requires no observer interactions and uses model cross-sectional area, center of mass, principal axes of inertia, and cylindrical surface fitting to construct the ACSs. The algorithm was applied to the femur and tibia of 10 (unpaired) human cadaveric knees. Due to the automated nature of the algorithm, the within specimen variability is zero for a given bone model. The algorithm's repeatability was evaluated by calculating variability in ACS location and orientation across specimens. Differences in ACS location and orientation between specimens were low (<1.5mm and <2.5 degrees). Variability arose primarily from natural anatomical and morphological differences between specimens. The presented algorithm provides an alternative method for automatically determining subject-specific ACSs from the distal femur and proximal tibia. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20167324      PMCID: PMC2866785          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes.

Authors:  E Most; J Axe; H Rubash; G Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Imaging knee position using MRI, RSA/CT and 3D digitisation.

Authors:  A McPherson; J Kärrholm; V Pinskerova; A Sosna; S Martelli
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality.

Authors:  Donald G Eckhoff; Joel M Bach; Victor M Spitzer; Karl D Reinig; Michelle M Bagur; Todd H Baldini; Nicolas M P Flannery
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The in vivo kinematics of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament during weightbearing knee flexion.

Authors:  Susan S Jordan; Louis E DeFrate; Kyung Wook Nha; Ramprasad Papannagari; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Integrating modelling, motion capture and x-ray fluoroscopy to investigate patellofemoral function during dynamic activity.

Authors:  J W Fernandez; M Akbarshahi; H J Kim; M G Pandy
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  An anatomy-based coordinate system for the description of the kinematic displacements in the human knee.

Authors:  G R Pennock; K J Clark
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  The role of ambulatory mechanics in the initiation and progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Thomas P Andriacchi; Annegret Mündermann
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking.

Authors:  J B Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Gait mechanics influence healthy cartilage morphology and osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Thomas P Andriacchi; Seungbum Koo; Sean F Scanlan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee.

Authors:  Thomas P Andriacchi; Anne Mündermann; R Lane Smith; Eugene J Alexander; Chris O Dyrby; Seungbum Koo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.934

  10 in total
  34 in total

Review 1.  Fluoroscopy-based tracking of femoral kinematics with statistical shape models.

Authors:  Marta Valenti; Elena De Momi; Weimin Yu; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Mohsen Akbari Shandiz; Carolyn Anglin; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Three-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging can provide a reliable estimate of the native anterior cruciate ligament insertion site anatomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Araki; Eric Thorhauer; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Evaluation of automated statistical shape model based knee kinematics from biplane fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Nora Baka; Bart L Kaptein; J Erik Giphart; Marius Staring; Marleen de Bruijne; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Edward Valstar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament bundle insertions vary between ACL-rupture and non-injured knees.

Authors:  Dimitris Dimitriou; Diyang Zou; Zhongzheng Wang; Naeder Helmy; Tsung-Yuan Tsai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Reconstructing the anterolateral ligament does not decrease rotational knee laxity in ACL-reconstructed knees.

Authors:  Kasper Stentz-Olesen; Emil Toft Nielsen; Sepp de Raedt; Peter Bo Jørgensen; Ole Gade Sørensen; Bart Kaptein; Kjeld Søballe; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Gaussian mixture models based 2D-3D registration of bone shapes for orthopedic surgery planning.

Authors:  Marta Valenti; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Dario Martina; Weimin Yu; Guoyan Zheng; Mohsen Akbari Shandiz; Carolyn Anglin; Elena De Momi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Static and dynamic error of a biplanar videoradiography system using marker-based and markerless tracking techniques.

Authors:  Daniel L Miranda; Joel B Schwartz; Andrew C Loomis; Elizabeth L Brainerd; Braden C Fleming; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Prediction and Validation of Load-Dependent Behavior of the Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Joints During Movement.

Authors:  Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Colin R Smith; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.