Literature DB >> 20181339

Differences in tibial rotation during walking in ACL reconstructed and healthy contralateral knees.

Sean F Scanlan1, Ajit M W Chaudhari, Chris O Dyrby, Thomas P Andriacchi.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypotheses that in patients with a successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the internal-external rotation, varus-valgus, and knee flexion position of reconstructed knees would be different from uninjured contralateral knees during walking. Twenty-six subjects with unilateral ACL reconstructions (avg 31 years, 1.7 m, 68 kg, 15 female, 24 months past reconstruction) and no other history of serious lower limb injury walked at a self-selected speed in the gait laboratory, with the uninjured contralateral knee as a matched control. Kinematic measurements of tibiofemoral motion were made using a previously-described point-cluster technique. Repeated-measures ANOVA (alpha=0.017) was used to compare ACL-reconstructed knees to their contralateral knees at four distinct points during the stance phase of walking. An offset towards external tibial rotation in ACL-reconstructed knees was maintained over all time points (95%CI 2.3+/-1.3 degrees ). Twenty-two out of twenty-six individuals experienced an average external tibial rotation offset throughout stance phase. Varus-valgus rotation and knee flexion were not significantly different between reconstructed and contralateral knees. These findings show that differences in tibial rotation during walking exist in ACL reconstructed knees compared to healthy contralateral knees, providing a potential explanation why these patients are at higher risk of knee osteoarthritis in the long-term. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20181339      PMCID: PMC2882513          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  49 in total

1.  Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients.

Authors:  N Sernert; J Kartus; K Köhler; S Stener; J Larsson; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an in vivo imaging analysis.

Authors:  Louis E Defrate; Ramprasad Papannagari; Thomas J Gill; Jeremy M Moses; Neil P Pathare; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  The role of the Rolimeter in quantifying knee instability compared to the functional outcome of ACL-reconstructed versus conservatively-treated knees.

Authors:  V Pollet; D Barrat; E Meirhaeghe; P Vaes; F Handelberg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: An outcome analysis comparing gender.

Authors:  J D Ferrari; B R Bach; C A Bush-Joseph; T Wang; J Bojchuk
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Stephanie K Brock; Scott Tashman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency alters the in vivo motion of the tibiofemoral cartilage contact points in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Jeremy M Moses; Ramprasad Papannagari; Neil P Pathare; Louis E DeFrate; Thomas J Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  C C Prodromos; T P Andriacchi; J O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  D M Daniel; L L Malcom; G Losse; M L Stone; R Sachs; R Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts.

Authors:  Jason M Scopp; Louis E Jasper; Stephen M Belkoff; Claude T Moorman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  The contralateral knee joint in cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Michal Kozanek; Samuel K Van de Velde; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  69 in total

1.  Effect of surgery to implant motion and force sensors on vertical ground reaction forces in the ovine model.

Authors:  Safa T Herfat; Jason T Shearn; Denis L Bailey; R Michael Greiwe; Marc T Galloway; Cindi Gooch; David L Butler
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Return of normal gait as an outcome measurement in acl reconstructed patients. A systematic review.

Authors:  A Gokeler; A Benjaminse; C F van Eck; K E Webster; L Schot; E Otten
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

4.  Dance between biology, mechanics, and structure: A systems-based approach to developing osteoarthritis prevention strategies.

Authors:  Constance R Chu; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Bone Plug Versus Suture-Only Fixation of Meniscal Grafts: Effect on Joint Contact Mechanics During Simulated Gait.

Authors:  Hongsheng Wang; Albert O Gee; Ian D Hutchinson; Kirsten Stoner; Russell F Warren; Tony O Chen; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The effects of femoral graft placement on cartilage thickness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eziamaka C Okafor; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Margaret R Widmyer; Ermias S Abebe; Amber T Collins; Dean C Taylor; Charles E Spritzer; C T Moorman; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Composite metric R2  - R (1/T2  - 1/T ) as a potential MR imaging biomarker associated with changes in pain after ACL reconstruction: A six-month follow-up.

Authors:  Colin Russell; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  A longitudinal evaluation of maturational effects on lower extremity strength in female adolescent athletes.

Authors:  Catherine C Quatman-Yates; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.049

Review 10.  New developments in osteoarthritis. Prevention of injury-related knee osteoarthritis: opportunities for the primary and secondary prevention of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Charles R Ratzlaff; Matthew H Liang
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.