Literature DB >> 27402457

Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Christopher V Nagelli1,2,3,4, Timothy E Hewett5,6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common knee injuries sustained by athletes during sports participation. A devastating complication of returning to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a second ACL injury. Strong evidence now indicates that younger, more active athletes are at particularly high risk for a second ACL injury, and this risk is greatest within the first 2 years following ACLR. Nearly one-third of the younger cohort that resumes sports participation will sustain a second ACL injury within the first 2 years after ACLR. The evidence indicates that the risk of second injury may abate over this time period. The incidence rate of second injuries in the first year after ACLR is significantly greater than the rate in the second year. The lower relative risk in the second year may be related to athletes achieving baseline joint health and function well after the current expected timeline (6-12 months) to be released to unrestricted activity. This highlights a considerable debate in the return to sport decision process as to whether an athlete should wait until 2 years after ACLR to return to unrestricted sports activity. In this review, we present evidence in the literature that athletes achieve baseline joint health and function approximately 2 years after ACLR. We postulate that delay in returning to sports for nearly 2 years will significantly reduce the incidence of second ACL injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27402457      PMCID: PMC5226931          DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0584-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  121 in total

1.  Bilateral proprioceptive defects in patients with a unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between patients and healthy individuals.

Authors:  D Roberts; T Fridén; A Stomberg; A Lindstrand; U Moritz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Follow-up of posttraumatic ligamentous and meniscal knee lesions detected at MR imaging: systematic review.

Authors:  Simone S Boks; Dammis Vroegindeweij; Bart W Koes; M G Myriam Hunink; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register.

Authors:  Lene Rahr-Wagner; Theis Muncholm Thillemann; Alma Becic Pedersen; Martin Carøe Lind
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lucy Salmon; Vivianne Russell; Tim Musgrove; Leo Pinczewski; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Sex-specific gait adaptations prior to and up to 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephanie Di Stasi; Erin H Hartigan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Analysis of return to competition and repeat rupture for 298 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with patellar or hamstring tendon autograft in sportspeople.

Authors:  E Laboute; L Savalli; P Puig; P Trouve; G Sabot; G Monnier; B Dubroca
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 7.  MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow signal alterations of the knee joint: terminology, imaging appearance, relevance and radiological differential diagnosis.

Authors:  F W Roemer; R Frobell; D J Hunter; M D Crema; W Fischer; K Bohndorf; A Guermazi
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Occult posttraumatic osteochondral lesions of the knee: prevalence, classification, and short-term sequelae evaluated with MR imaging.

Authors:  A D Vellet; P H Marks; P J Fowler; T G Munro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Olav A Foss; Lars Engebretsen; Martin Lind; Magnus Forssblad; Grethe Albrektsen; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Gait patterns differ between ACL-reconstructed athletes who pass return-to-sport criteria and those who fail.

Authors:  Stephanie L Di Stasi; David Logerstedt; Emily S Gardinier; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  88 in total

Review 1.  ACL Return to Sport Guidelines and Criteria.

Authors:  George J Davies; Eric McCarty; Matthew Provencher; Robert C Manske
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

2.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Research Retreat VIII Summary Statement: An Update on Injury Risk Identification and Prevention Across the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Continuum, March 14-16, 2019, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Kenneth L Cameron; Kevin R Ford; Dustin R Grooms; Lindsey K Lepley; Gregory D Myer; Brian Pietrosimone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Optimising the Late-Stage Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sport Training and Testing Process After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew Buckthorpe
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Return to sports after ACL reconstruction: a paradigm shift from time to function.

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Christian Fink; Sebastian Kopf
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  [Big data and deep learning in preventive and rehabilitation medicine].

Authors:  M Jäger; C Mayer; H Hefter; M Siebler; A Kecskeméthy
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Is post-surgical rehabilitation sufficient? Would it be better to rehabituate?

Authors:  John Nyland
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Does patellar alignment or trochlear morphology predict worsening of patellofemoral disease within the first 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Erin M Macri; Brooke E Patterson; Kay M Crossley; Josh J Stefanik; Ali Guermazi; Evelina Blomqwist; Karim M Khan; Tim S Whitehead; Hayden G Morris; Adam G Culvenor
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  Performance: Bridging the Gap After ACL Surgery.

Authors:  Polly de Mille; Jamie Osmak
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

9.  Biomechanical Deficits at the Hip in Athletes With ACL Reconstruction Are Ameliorated With Neuromuscular Training.

Authors:  Christopher Nagelli; Samuel Wordeman; Stephanie Di Stasi; Joshua Hoffman; Tiffany Marulli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Time for a Different Approach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Educate and Create Realistic Expectations.

Authors:  Joshua Robert Zadro; Evangelos Pappas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.