Literature DB >> 28910722

Analysis of in-vivo articular cartilage contact surface of the knee during a step-up motion.

Peng Yin1, Jing-Sheng Li2, Willem A Kernkamp2, Tsung-Yuan Tsai2, Seung-Hoon Baek2, Ali Hosseini2, Lin Lin3, Peifu Tang4, Guoan Li5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported on the tibiofemoral articular cartilage contact kinematics, however, no data has been reported on the articular cartilage geometry at the contact area. This study investigated the in-vivo tibiofemoral articular cartilage contact biomechanics during a dynamic step-up motion.
METHODS: Ten healthy subjects were imaged using a validated magnetic resonance and dual fluoroscopic imaging technique during a step-up motion. Three-dimensional bone and cartilage models were constructed from the magnetic resonance images. The cartilage contact along the motion path was analyzed, including cartilage contact location and the cartilage surface geometry at the contact area.
FINDINGS: The cartilage contact excursions were similar in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions in the medial and lateral compartments of the tibia plateau (P>0.05). Both medial and lateral compartments were under convex (femur) to convex (tibia) contact in the sagittal plane, and under convex (femur) to concave (tibia) contact in the coronal plane. The medial tibial articular contact radius was larger than the lateral side in the sagittal plane along the motion path (P<0.001). INTERPRETATIONS: These data revealed that both the medial and lateral compartments of the knee experienced convex (femur) to convex (tibia) contact in sagittal plane (or anteroposterior direction) during the dynamic step-up motion. These data could provide new insight into the in-vivo cartilage contact biomechanics research, and may provide guidelines for development of anatomical total knee arthroplasties that are aimed to reproduce normal knee joint kinematics.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage; Cartilage contact; Contact geometry; In-vivo kinematics; Knee; Step up motion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28910722      PMCID: PMC5681875          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  40 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty and native knees.

Authors:  M P Bonnin; M Saffarini; N Bossard; E Dantony; J Victor
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Reverse Engineering Nature to Design Biomimetic Total Knee Implants.

Authors:  Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan; Thomas Zumbrunn; Harry E Rubash; Henrik Malchau; Orhun K Muratoglu; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Load Sharing Among Collateral Ligaments, Articular Surfaces, and the Tibial Post in Constrained Condylar Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xiaonan Wang; Aamer Malik; Donald L Bartel; Timothy M Wright; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Kinematic characteristics of the tibiofemoral joint during a step-up activity.

Authors:  Jing-Sheng Li; Ali Hosseini; Lucile Cancre; Nolan Ryan; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  The influence and biomechanical role of cartilage split line pattern on tibiofemoral cartilage stress distribution during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Vickie B Shim; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Kumar Mithraratne; Justin F Fernandez
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-04-10

6.  Future directions in knee replacement.

Authors:  P S Walker; G Yildirim; S Arno; Y Heller
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  In vivo tibiofemoral contact analysis using 3D MRI-based knee models.

Authors:  Louis E DeFrate; Hao Sun; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  How to assess femoral and tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty with computed tomography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eduard J De Valk; Julia C A Noorduyn; Eduard L A R Mutsaerts
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  In vivo cartilage contact deformation in the healthy human tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  J T Bingham; R Papannagari; S K Van de Velde; C Gross; T J Gill; D T Felson; H E Rubash; G Li
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  The Meniscus-Deficient Knee: Biomechanics, Evaluation, and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Allison J Rao; Brandon J Erickson; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Adam B Yanke; Bernard R Bach; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10-23
View more
  3 in total

1.  Articulation of the femoral condyle during knee flexion.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Chaochao Zhou; Zhenming Zhang; Timothy Foster; Hany Bedair
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Osteoarthritis year in review 2018: mechanics.

Authors:  L E DeFrate; S Y Kim-Wang; Z A Englander; A L McNulty
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Physiological articular contact kinematics and morphological femoral condyle translations of the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Chaochao Zhou; Zhenming Zhang; Zhitao Rao; Timothy Foster; Hany Bedair; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.789

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.