Michael F Vignos1, Jarred M Kaiser2, Geoffrey S Baer3, Richard Kijowski4, Darryl G Thelen5. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: mvignos@wisc.edu. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, 110 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215, USA. 3. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA. 5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA; Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: dgthelen@wisc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormal knee mechanics may contribute to early cartilage degeneration following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anterior cruciate ligament graft geometry has previously been linked to abnormal tibiofemoral kinematics, suggesting this parameter may be important in restoring normative cartilage loading. However, the relationship between graft geometry and cartilage contact is unknown. METHODS: Static MR images were collected and segmented for eighteen subjects to obtain bone, cartilage, and anterior cruciate ligament geometries for their reconstructed and contralateral knees. The footprint locations and orientation of the anterior cruciate ligament were calculated. Volumetric, dynamic MR imaging was also performed to measure tibiofemoral kinematics, cartilage contact location, and contact sliding velocity while subjects performed loaded knee flexion-extension. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the relationship between non-anatomic graft geometry and asymmetric knee mechanics. FINDINGS: Non-anatomic graft geometry was related to asymmetric knee mechanics, with the sagittal plane graft angle being the best predictor of asymmetry. A more vertical sagittal graft angle was associated with greater anterior tibial translation (β = 0.11mmdeg, P = 0.049, R2 = 0.22), internal tibial rotation (β = 0.27degdeg, P = 0.042, R2 = 0.23), and adduction angle (β = 0.15degdeg, P = 0.013, R2 = 0.44) at peak knee flexion. A non-anatomic sagittal graft orientation was also linked to asymmetries in tibial contact location and sliding velocity on the medial (β = -4.2mmsdeg, P = 0.002, R2 = 0.58) and lateral tibial plateaus (β = 5.7mmsdeg, P = 0.006, R2 = 0.54). INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence that non-anatomic graft geometry is linked to asymmetric knee mechanics, suggesting that restoring native anterior cruciate ligament geometry may be important to mitigate the risk of early cartilage degeneration in these patients.
BACKGROUND: Abnormal knee mechanics may contribute to early cartilage degeneration following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anterior cruciate ligament graft geometry has previously been linked to abnormal tibiofemoral kinematics, suggesting this parameter may be important in restoring normative cartilage loading. However, the relationship between graft geometry and cartilage contact is unknown. METHODS: Static MR images were collected and segmented for eighteen subjects to obtain bone, cartilage, and anterior cruciate ligament geometries for their reconstructed and contralateral knees. The footprint locations and orientation of the anterior cruciate ligament were calculated. Volumetric, dynamic MR imaging was also performed to measure tibiofemoral kinematics, cartilage contact location, and contact sliding velocity while subjects performed loaded knee flexion-extension. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the relationship between non-anatomic graft geometry and asymmetric knee mechanics. FINDINGS: Non-anatomic graft geometry was related to asymmetric knee mechanics, with the sagittal plane graft angle being the best predictor of asymmetry. A more vertical sagittal graft angle was associated with greater anterior tibial translation (β = 0.11mmdeg, P = 0.049, R2 = 0.22), internal tibial rotation (β = 0.27degdeg, P = 0.042, R2 = 0.23), and adduction angle (β = 0.15degdeg, P = 0.013, R2 = 0.44) at peak knee flexion. A non-anatomic sagittal graft orientation was also linked to asymmetries in tibial contact location and sliding velocity on the medial (β = -4.2mmsdeg, P = 0.002, R2 = 0.58) and lateral tibial plateaus (β = 5.7mmsdeg, P = 0.006, R2 = 0.54). INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence that non-anatomic graft geometry is linked to asymmetric knee mechanics, suggesting that restoring native anterior cruciate ligament geometry may be important to mitigate the risk of early cartilage degeneration in these patients.
Authors: John C Loh; Yukihisa Fukuda; Eiichi Tsuda; Richard J Steadman; Freddie H Fu; Savio L Y Woo Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Volker Musahl; Asheesh Bedi; Musa Citak; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Daniel Choi; Andrew D Pearle Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Jarred Kaiser; Arezu Monawer; Rajeev Chaudhary; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: Carl Laverdiere; Drew Schupbach; Justin Schupbach; Eric Harvey; Mathieu Boily; Mark Burman; Paul A Martineau Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2020-07-29