Literature DB >> 34989019

Knee joint biomechanics during gait improve from 3 to 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Kelsey Neal1, Jack R Williams1, Abdulmajeed Alfayyadh2, Jacob J Capin2,3,4,5,6, Ashutosh Khandha7, Kurt Manal8, Lynn Snyder-Mackler2,3,7, Thomas S Buchanan1,2,7.   

Abstract

Gait alterations after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are commonly reported and have been linked to posttraumatic osteoarthritis development. While knee gait alterations have been studied at several time points after ACLR, little is known about how these biomechanical variables change earlier than 6 months after surgery, nor is much known about how they differ over the entire stance phase of gait. The purpose of this study was to examine knee gait biomechanical variables over their entire movement pattern through stance at both 3 and 6 months after ACLR and to study the progression of interlimb asymmetry between the two postoperative time points. Thirty-five individuals underwent motion analysis during overground walking 3 (3.2 ± 0.5) and 6 (6.4 ± 0.7) months after ACLR. Knee biomechanical variables were compared between limbs and across time points through 100% of stance using statistical parametric mapping; this included a 2 × 2 (Limb × Time) repeated measures analysis of variance and two-tailed t-tests. Smaller knee joint angles, moments, extensor forces, and medial compartment forces were present in the involved versus uninvolved limb. Interlimb asymmetries were present at both time points but were less prevalent at 6 months. The uninvolved limb's biomechanical variables stayed relatively consistent over time, while the involved limb's trended toward that of the uninvolved limb. Statement of Clinical Significance: Interventions to correct asymmetrical gait patterns after ACLR may need to occur early after surgery and may need to focus on multiple parts of stance phase.
© 2022 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACLR; gait biomechanics; kinematics and kinetics; knee; statistical parametric mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34989019      PMCID: PMC9256843          DOI: 10.1002/jor.25250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.102


  74 in total

1.  Generalized n-dimensional biomechanical field analysis using statistical parametric mapping.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Greater magnitude tibiofemoral contact forces are associated with reduced prevalence of osteochondral pathologies 2-3 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  David John Saxby; Adam L Bryant; Ans Van Ginckel; Yuanyuan Wang; Xinyang Wang; Luca Modenese; Pauline Gerus; Jason M Konrath; Karine Fortin; Tim V Wrigley; Kim L Bennell; Flavia M Cicuttini; Christopher Vertullo; Julian A Feller; Tim Whitehead; Price Gallie; David G Lloyd
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Dance between biology, mechanics, and structure: A systems-based approach to developing osteoarthritis prevention strategies.

Authors:  Constance R Chu; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Co-activation during gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Troy Blackburn; Brian Pietrosimone; Jonathan S Goodwin; Chris Johnston; Jeffrey T Spang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  The probability of false positives in zero-dimensional analyses of one-dimensional kinematic, force and EMG trajectories.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Jos Vanrenterghem; Mark A Robinson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The knee adduction moment in hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Identify fracture-critical regions inside the proximal femur using statistical parametric mapping.

Authors:  Wenjun Li; John Kornak; Tamara Harris; Joyce Keyak; Caixia Li; Ying Lu; Xiaoguang Cheng; Thomas Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Gait Characteristics Associated With a Greater Increase in Medial Knee Cartilage T and T2 Relaxation Times in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ling Teng; Daniel Wu; Favian Su; Valentina Pedoia; Richard B Souza; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Decreased Knee Joint Loading Associated With Early Knee Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wellsandt; Emily S Gardinier; Kurt Manal; Michael J Axe; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Bilateral Gait 6 and 12 Months Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared with Controls.

Authors:  Hope C Davis-Wilson; Steven J Pfeiffer; Christopher D Johnston; Matthew K Seeley; Matthew S Harkey; J Troy Blackburn; Ryan P Fockler; Jeffrey T Spang; Brian Pietrosimone
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.