Literature DB >> 27387902

Accuracy of model-based tracking of knee kinematics and cartilage contact measured by dynamic volumetric MRI.

Jarred Kaiser1, Arezu Monawer1, Rajeev Chaudhary2, Kevin M Johnson3, Oliver Wieben4, Richard Kijowski5, Darryl G Thelen6.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of knee kinematics and cartilage contact measured by volumetric dynamic MRI. A motor-actuated phantom drove femoral and tibial bone segments through cyclic 3D motion patterns. Volumetric images were continuously acquired using a 3D radially undersampled cine spoiled gradient echo sequence (SPGR-VIPR). Image data was binned based on position measured via a MRI-compatible rotary encoder. High-resolution static images were segmented to create bone models. Model-based tracking was performed by optimally registering the bone models to the volumetric images at each frame of the SPGR-VIPR series. 3D tibiofemoral translations and orientations were reconstructed, and compared to kinematics obtained by tracking fiducial markers. Imaging was repeated on a healthy subject who performed cyclic knee flexion-extension. Cartilage contact for the subject was assessed by measuring the overlap between articular cartilage surfaces. Model-based tracking was able to track tibiofemoral angles and translations with precisions less than 0.8° and 0.5mm. These precisions resulted in an uncertainty of less than 0.5mm in cartilage contact location. Dynamic SPGR-VIPR imaging can accurately assess in vivo knee kinematics and cartilage contact during voluntary knee motion performed in a MRI scanner. This technology could facilitate the quantitative investigation of links between joint mechanics and the development of osteoarthritis.
Copyright © 2016 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Dynamic MRI; Knee kinematics; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27387902      PMCID: PMC5035576          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  36 in total

1.  Precise 3D skeletal kinematics using fast phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andrea J Rebmann; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Tracking myocardial deformation using phase contrast MR velocity fields: a stochastic approach.

Authors:  F G Meyer; R T Constable; A J Sinusas; J S Duncan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Rapid multicomponent T2 analysis of the articular cartilage of the human knee joint at 3.0T.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Rajeev Chaudhary; Samuel A Hurley; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Andrew L Alexander; Alexey Samsonov; Walter F Block; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers.

Authors:  I Söderkvist; P A Wedin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  In vivo patellofemoral contact mechanics during active extension using a novel dynamic MRI-based methodology.

Authors:  B S Borotikar; F T Sheehan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  High-resolution MRI detects cartilage swelling at the early stages of experimental osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E Calvo; I Palacios; E Delgado; J Ruiz-Cabello; P Hernández; O Sánchez-Pernaute; J Egido; G Herrero-Beaumont
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value.

Authors:  R Burgkart; C Glaser; A Hyhlik-Dürr; K H Englmeier; M Reiser; F Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-09

8.  Tracking of cyclic motion with phase-contrast cine MR velocity data.

Authors:  N J Pelc; M Drangova; L R Pelc; Y Zhu; D C Noll; B S Bowman; R J Herfkens
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Change in cartilage thickness, posttraumatic bone marrow lesions, and joint fluid volumes after acute ACL disruption: a two-year prospective MRI study of sixty-one subjects.

Authors:  Richard B Frobell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Feasibility of using real-time MRI to measure joint kinematics in 1.5T and open-bore 0.5T systems.

Authors:  Christine E Draper; Juan M Santos; Lampros C Kourtis; Thor F Besier; Michael Fredericson; Gary S Beaupre; Garry E Gold; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  4 in total

1.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Dynamic MRI to quantify musculoskeletal motion: A systematic review of concurrent validity and reliability, and perspectives for evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Bhushan Borotikar; Mathieu Lempereur; Mathieu Lelievre; Valérie Burdin; Douraied Ben Salem; Sylvain Brochard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cartilage defect location and stiffness predispose the tibiofemoral joint to aberrant loading conditions during stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Lianne Zevenbergen; Colin R Smith; Sam Van Rossom; Darryl G Thelen; Nele Famaey; Jos Vander Sloten; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.