Literature DB >> 27013696

A Prototype High-Resolution Small-Animal PET Scanner Dedicated to Mouse Brain Imaging.

Yongfeng Yang1, Julien Bec2, Jian Zhou2, Mengxi Zhang2, Martin S Judenhofer2, Xiaowei Bai2, Kun Di2, Yibao Wu2, Mercedes Rodriguez3, Purushottam Dokhale4, Kanai S Shah4, Richard Farrell4, Jinyi Qi2, Simon R Cherry2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We developed a prototype small-animal PET scanner based on depth-encoding detectors using dual-ended readout of small scintillator elements to produce high and uniform spatial resolution suitable for imaging the mouse brain.
METHODS: The scanner consists of 16 tapered dual-ended-readout detectors arranged in a 61-mm-diameter ring. The axial field of view (FOV) is 7 mm, and the transaxial FOV is 30 mm. The scintillator arrays consist of 14 × 14 lutetium oxyorthosilicate elements, with a crystal size of 0.43 × 0.43 mm at the front end and 0.80 × 0.43 mm at the back end, and the crystal elements are 13 mm long. The arrays are read out by 8 × 8 mm and 13 × 8 mm position-sensitive avalanche photodiodes (PSAPDs) placed at opposite ends of the array. Standard nuclear-instrumentation-module electronics and a custom-designed multiplexer are used for signal processing.
RESULTS: The detector performance was measured, and all but the crystals at the very edge could be clearly resolved. The average intrinsic spatial resolution in the axial direction was 0.61 mm. A depth-of-interaction resolution of 1.7 mm was achieved. The sensitivity of the scanner at the center of the FOV was 1.02% for a lower energy threshold of 150 keV and 0.68% for a lower energy threshold of 250 keV. The spatial resolution within a FOV that can accommodate the entire mouse brain was approximately 0.6 mm using a 3-dimensional maximum-likelihood expectation maximization reconstruction. Images of a hot-rod microphantom showed that rods with a diameter of as low as 0.5 mm could be resolved. The first in vivo studies were performed using (18)F-fluoride and confirmed that a 0.6-mm resolution can be achieved in the mouse head in vivo. Brain imaging studies with (18)F-FDG were also performed.
CONCLUSION: We developed a prototype PET scanner that can achieve a spatial resolution approaching the physical limits of a small-bore PET scanner set by positron range and detector interaction. We plan to add more detector rings to extend the axial FOV of the scanner and increase sensitivity.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain imaging; high resolution; mouse; positron emission tomography; small animal PET

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27013696      PMCID: PMC5497697          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.165886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  24 in total

1.  National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-4 performance evaluation of the PET component of the NanoPET/CT preclinical PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Istvan Szanda; Jane Mackewn; Gergely Patay; Peter Major; Kavitha Sunassee; Gregory E Mullen; Gabor Nemeth; York Haemisch; Philip J Blower; Paul K Marsden
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  High-resolution PET detector design: modelling components of intrinsic spatial resolution.

Authors:  Jennifer R Stickel; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Evaluation of high performance data acquisition boards for simultaneous sampling of fast signals from PET detectors.

Authors:  Martin S Judenhofer; Bernd J Pichler; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Simultaneous acquisition of multislice PET and MR images: initial results with a MR-compatible PET scanner.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Yibao Wu; Martin S Judenhofer; Jinyi Qi; Bernd J Pichler; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  The 2006 Henry N. Wagner Lecture: Of mice and men (and positrons)--advances in PET imaging technology.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Instrumentation aspects of animal PET.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Richard Laforest
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 7.  Recent development in PET instrumentation.

Authors:  By Hao Peng; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.837

8.  Signal and noise properties of position-sensitive avalanche photodiodes.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Yibao Wu; Richard Farrell; Purushottam A Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Recent developments in PET detector technology.

Authors:  Tom K Lewellen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Development of an ultrahigh resolution Si-PM based PET system for small animals.

Authors:  Seiichi Yamamoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yasukazu Kanai; Tadashi Watabe; Katsuhiko Kato; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  26 in total

1.  A preclinical PET detector constructed with a monolithic scintillator ring.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; Siwei Xie; Xi Zhang; Weijie Tao; Jingwu Yang; Zhixiang Zhao; Fenghua Weng; Qiu Huang; Fei Yi; Qiyu Peng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Small animal, positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging system based on a clinical magnetic resonance imaging scanner: evaluation of basic imaging performance.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Patrick Ledden; Alexander V Stolin; Bob Hou; Ganghadar Jaliparthi; Peter F Martone
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-09-08

4.  Dual-ended readout of bismuth germanate to improve timing resolution in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Sun Il Kwon; Emilie Roncali; Alberto Gola; Giovanni Paternoster; Claudio Piemonte; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Compton PET: A Simulation Study for a PET Module with Novel Geometry and Machine Learning for Position Decoding.

Authors:  Peng Peng; Martin S Judenhofer; Adam Q Jones; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2018-11-30

6.  Performance of a high-resolution depth-encoding PET detector module using linearly-graded SiPM arrays.

Authors:  Junwei Du; Xiaowei Bai; Alberto Gola; Fabio Acerbi; Alessandro Ferri; Claudio Piemonte; Yongfeng Yang; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Optimization of a depth of interaction encoding PET block detector for a PET/MRI insert.

Authors:  Aaron R Selfridge; Simon R Cherry; Martin S Judenhofer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Machine learning in quantitative PET: A review of attenuation correction and low-count image reconstruction methods.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jonathon A Nye; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  Hybrid Pixel-Waveform (HPWF) Enabled CdTe Detectors for Small Animal Gamma-Ray Imaging Applications.

Authors:  A Groll; K Kim; H Bhatia; J C Zhang; J H Wang; Z M Shen; L Cai; J Dutta; Q Li; L J Meng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-01

10.  A novel depth-of-interaction rebinning strategy for ultrahigh resolution PET.

Authors:  Kyungsang Kim; Joyita Dutta; Andrew Groll; Georges El Fakhri; Ling-Jian Meng; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.