Literature DB >> 30520420

Optimization of a depth of interaction encoding PET block detector for a PET/MRI insert.

Aaron R Selfridge1, Simon R Cherry, Martin S Judenhofer.   

Abstract

Preclinical positron emission tomography, combined with magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), is increasingly used as a tool to simultaneously characterize functional processes in vivo. Many emerging preclinical applications, however, are limited by PET detection sensitivity, especially when generating short imaging frames for quantitative studies. One such application is dynamic multifunctional imaging, which probes multiple aspects of a biological process, using relationships between the datasets to quantify interactions. These studies have limited accuracy due to the relatively low sensitivity of modern preclinical PET/MRI systems. The goal of this project is to develop a preclinical PET/MRI insert with detection sensitivity above 15% (250-750 keV) to improve quantitation in dynamic PET imaging. To achieve this sensitivity, we have developed a detector module incorporating a 2 cm thick crystal block, which will be arranged into a system with 8 cm axial FOV, targeting mice and rats. To maintain homogenous spatial resolution, the detector will incorporate dual-ended depth-of-interaction (DOI) encoding with silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) based photodetector arrays. The specific aim of this work is to identify a detector configuration with adequate performance for the proposed system. We have optimized the SiPM array geometry and tested two crystal array materials with pitch ranging from 0.8 to 1.2 mm and various surface treatments and reflectors. From these configurations, we have identified the best balance between crystal separation, energy resolution, and DOI resolution. The final detector module uses two rectangular SiPM arrays with 5  ×  6 and 5  ×  4 elements. The photodetector arrays are coupled to a 19  ×  19 array of 1 mm pitch LYSO crystals with polished surfaces and a diffuse reflector. The prototype design has 14.3%  ±  2.9% energy resolution, 3.57  ±  0.88 mm DOI resolution, and resolves all elements in the crystal array, giving it sufficient performance to serve as the basis for the proposed high sensitivity PET/MRI insert.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30520420      PMCID: PMC6505471          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaef59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  23 in total

1.  Small animal PET scanner based on monolithic LYSO crystals: performance evaluation.

Authors:  F Sanchez; L Moliner; C Correcher; A Gonzalez; A Orero; M Carles; A Soriano; M J Rodriguez-Alvarez; L A Medina; F Mora; J M Benlloch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Initial results of simultaneous PET/MRI experiments with an MRI-compatible silicon photomultiplier PET scanner.

Authors:  Hyun Suk Yoon; Guen Bae Ko; Sun Il Kwon; Chan Mi Lee; Mikiko Ito; In Chan Song; Dong Soo Lee; Seong Jong Hong; Jae Sung Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Evaluation of a silicon photomultiplier PET insert for simultaneous PET and MR imaging.

Authors:  Guen Bae Ko; Kyeong Yun Kim; Hyun Suk Yoon; Min Sun Lee; Jeong-Whan Son; Hyung-Jun Im; Jae Sung Lee
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Evaluation of high performance data acquisition boards for simultaneous sampling of fast signals from PET detectors.

Authors:  Martin S Judenhofer; Bernd J Pichler; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Simulation of light transport in scintillators based on 3D characterization of crystal surfaces.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Effects of reflector and crystal surface on the performance of a depth-encoding PET detector with dual-ended readout.

Authors:  Silin Ren; Yongfeng Yang; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Performance of a PET Insert for High-Resolution Small-Animal PET/MRI at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Greg Stortz; Jonathan D Thiessen; Daryl Bishop; Muhammad Salman Khan; Piotr Kozlowski; Fabrice Retière; Graham Schellenberg; Ehsan Shams; Xuezhu Zhang; Christopher J Thompson; Andrew L Goertzen; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Initial performance evaluation of a preclinical PET scanner available as a clip-on assembly in a sequential PET/MRI system.

Authors:  J M Vrigneaud; J McGrath; A Courteau; R Pegg; A Sanchez-Pastor Gomis; A Camacho; G Martin; N Schramm; F Brunotte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Simultaneous Multiparametric PET/MRI with Silicon Photomultiplier PET and Ultra-High-Field MRI for Small-Animal Imaging.

Authors:  Guen Bae Ko; Hyun Suk Yoon; Kyeong Yun Kim; Min Sun Lee; Bo Yeun Yang; Jae Min Jeong; Dong Soo Lee; In Chan Song; Seok-Ki Kim; Daehong Kim; Jae Sung Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.