Tommaso D'Angelo1,2, Andreas M Bucher1, Lukas Lenga1, Christophe T Arendt1, Julia L Peterke1, Damiano Caruso3, Silvio Mazziotti2, Alfredo Blandino2, Giorgio Ascenti2, Ahmed E Othman4, Simon S Martin1, Doris Leithner1, Thomas J Vogl1, Julian L Wichmann5. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 2. Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, "G. Martino" University Hospital Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98100, Messina, Italy. 3. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "La Sapienza" University Hospital, Latina, Italy. 4. Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 5. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. docwichmann@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To define optimal window settings for displaying virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) of dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography (DE-CTPA). METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent clinically-indicated third-generation dual-source DE-CTPA were retrospectively evaluated. Standard linearly-blended (M_0.6), 70-keV traditional VMI (M70), and 40-keV noise-optimised VMI (M40+) reconstructions were analysed. For M70 and M40+ datasets, the subjectively best window setting (width and level, B-W/L) was independently determined by two observers and subsequently related with pulmonary artery attenuation to calculate separate optimised values (O-W/L) using linear regression. Subjective evaluation of image quality (IQ) between W/L settings were assessed by two additional readers. Repeated measures of variance were performed to compare W/L settings and IQ indices between M_0.6, M70, and M40+. RESULTS: B-W/L and O-W/L for M70 were 460/140 and 450/140, and were 1100/380 and 1070/380 for M40+, respectively, differing from standard DE-CTPA W/L settings (450/100). Highest subjective scores were observed for M40+ regarding vascular contrast, embolism demarcation, and overall IQ (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Application of O-W/L settings is beneficial to optimise subjective IQ of VMI reconstructions of DE-CTPA. A width slightly less than two times the pulmonary trunk attenuation and a level approximately of overall pulmonary vessel attenuation are recommended. KEY POINTS: • Application of standard window settings for VMI results in inferior image perception. • No significant differences between B-W/L and O-W/L for M70/M40+ were observed. • O-W/L for M70 were 450/140 and were 1070/380 for M40+. • Improved subjective IQ characteristics were observed for VMI displayed with O-W/L.
OBJECTIVES: To define optimal window settings for displaying virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) of dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography (DE-CTPA). METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent clinically-indicated third-generation dual-source DE-CTPA were retrospectively evaluated. Standard linearly-blended (M_0.6), 70-keV traditional VMI (M70), and 40-keV noise-optimised VMI (M40+) reconstructions were analysed. For M70 and M40+ datasets, the subjectively best window setting (width and level, B-W/L) was independently determined by two observers and subsequently related with pulmonary artery attenuation to calculate separate optimised values (O-W/L) using linear regression. Subjective evaluation of image quality (IQ) between W/L settings were assessed by two additional readers. Repeated measures of variance were performed to compare W/L settings and IQ indices between M_0.6, M70, and M40+. RESULTS: B-W/L and O-W/L for M70 were 460/140 and 450/140, and were 1100/380 and 1070/380 for M40+, respectively, differing from standard DE-CTPA W/L settings (450/100). Highest subjective scores were observed for M40+ regarding vascular contrast, embolism demarcation, and overall IQ (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Application of O-W/L settings is beneficial to optimise subjective IQ of VMI reconstructions of DE-CTPA. A width slightly less than two times the pulmonary trunk attenuation and a level approximately of overall pulmonary vessel attenuation are recommended. KEY POINTS: • Application of standard window settings for VMI results in inferior image perception. • No significant differences between B-W/L and O-W/L for M70/M40+ were observed. • O-W/L for M70 were 450/140 and were 1070/380 for M40+. • Improved subjective IQ characteristics were observed for VMI displayed with O-W/L.
Authors: Martin Beeres; Jesko Trommer; Claudia Frellesen; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Jan E Scholtz; Eva Herrmann; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Lukas Lenga; Moritz H Albrecht; Ahmed E Othman; Simon S Martin; Doris Leithner; Tommaso D'Angelo; Christophe Arendt; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Carlo N De Cecco; U Joseph Schoepf; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Damiano Caruso; Ashley H Parinella; U Joseph Schoepf; Maxwell H Stroebel; Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; Akos Varga-Szemes; B Devon Ball; Domenico De Santis; Andrea Laghi; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2017-03
Authors: Katherine E Maturen; Ravi K Kaza; Peter S Liu; Leslie E Quint; Shokoufeh H Khalatbari; Joel F Platt Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Moritz H Albrecht; Jesko Trommer; Julian L Wichmann; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Simon S Martin; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Boris Bodelle Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Jacek Kurcz; Jerzy Garcarek; Maciej Guziński; Anna Czarnecka; Marek J Sąsiadek Journal: Adv Clin Exp Med Date: 2013 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.727
Authors: Carlo N De Cecco; Damiano Caruso; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Janet R Ter Louw; Jonathan D Perry; Melissa M Picard; Amanda R Schaefer; Leland W Parker; Andrew D Hardie Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Moritz H Albrecht; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Kristina Hüsers; Martin Beeres; Andreas M Bucher; Moritz Kaup; Simon S Martin; Sebastian Fischer; Boris Bodelle; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Giuseppe Cicero; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Alfredo Blandino; Marco Cavallaro; Tommaso D'Angelo; Maria Ludovica Carerj; Thomas J Vogl; Silvio Mazziotti Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: David Zopfs; Simon Lennartz; Nuran Abdullayev; Thorsten Lichtenstein; Kai Roman Laukamp; Robert Peter Reimer; Christoph Kabbasch; Jan Borggrefe; Marc Schlamann; Victor Neuhaus; Nils Große Hokamp Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-08
Authors: Andra-Iza Iuga; Jonas Doerner; Florian Siedek; Stefan Haneder; Jonathan Byrtus; Julian A Luetkens; David Maintz; Tilman Hickethier Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Serena Dell'Aversana; Raffaele Ascione; Marco De Giorgi; Davide Raffaele De Lucia; Renato Cuocolo; Marco Boccalatte; Gerolamo Sibilio; Giovanni Napolitano; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Sandro Sironi; Giuseppe Di Costanzo; Enrico Cavaglià; Massimo Imbriaco; Andrea Ponsiglione Journal: J Imaging Date: 2022-09-01