Domenico De Santis1,2, Carlo N De Cecco1, U Joseph Schoepf3, John W Nance1, Ricardo T Yamada1, Brooke A Thomas1, Katharina Otani4, Brian E Jacobs1, D Alan Turner1, Julian L Wichmann5, Marwen Eid1, Akos Varga-Szemes1, Damiano Caruso2, Katharine L Grant6, Bernhard Schmidt7, Thomas J Vogl5, Andrea Laghi2, Moritz H Albrecht1,5. 1. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, USA. 2. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, "Sapienza" - University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, USA. schoepf@musc.edu. 4. Imaging and Therapy Systems Division, Healthcare Sector, Siemens Japan K.K., Tokyo, Japan. 5. Division of Experimental and Translational Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 6. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc, Malvern, PA, USA. 7. Division of Computed Tomography, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a modified three-material decomposition calcium subtraction (CS) algorithm for the detection of arterial stenosis in dual-energy CT angiography (DE-CTA) of the lower extremity runoff compared to standard image reconstruction, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients (53 males; mean age, 65.9 ± 11 years) with suspected peripheral arterial disease (PAD) who had undergone a DE-CTA examination of the lower extremity runoff between May 2014 and May 2015 were included in this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Standard linearly blended and CS images were reconstructed and vascular contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated. Two independent observers assessed subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. Diagnostic accuracy for ≥ 50% stenosis detection was analyzed in a subgroup of 45 patients who had undergone additional DSA. Diagnostic accuracy parameters were estimated with a random-effects logistic regression analysis and compared using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: CS datasets showed higher CNR (15.3 ± 7.3) compared to standard reconstructions (13.5 ± 6.5, p < 0.001). Both reconstructions showed comparable qualitative image quality scores (CS, 4.64; standard, 4.57; p = 0.220). Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) for CS reconstructions was 96.5% (97.5%, 95.6%, 90.9%, 98.1) and 93.1% (98.8%, 90.4%, 82.3%, 99.1%) for standard images. CONCLUSIONS: A modified three-material decomposition CS algorithm provides increased vascular CNR, equivalent qualitative image quality, and greater diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant arterial stenosis of the lower extremity runoff on DE-CTA compared with standard image reconstruction. KEY POINTS: • Calcified plaques may lead to overestimation of stenosis severity and false positive results, requiring additional invasive digital subtraction angiography (DSA). • A modified three-material decomposition algorithm for calcium subtraction provides greater diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant arterial stenosis of the lower extremity runoff compared with standard image reconstruction. • The application of this algorithm in patients with heavily calcified vessels may be helpful to potentially reduce inconclusive CT angiography examinations and the need for subsequent invasive DSA.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a modified three-material decomposition calcium subtraction (CS) algorithm for the detection of arterial stenosis in dual-energy CT angiography (DE-CTA) of the lower extremity runoff compared to standard image reconstruction, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients (53 males; mean age, 65.9 ± 11 years) with suspected peripheral arterial disease (PAD) who had undergone a DE-CTA examination of the lower extremity runoff between May 2014 and May 2015 were included in this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Standard linearly blended and CS images were reconstructed and vascular contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated. Two independent observers assessed subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. Diagnostic accuracy for ≥ 50% stenosis detection was analyzed in a subgroup of 45 patients who had undergone additional DSA. Diagnostic accuracy parameters were estimated with a random-effects logistic regression analysis and compared using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS:CS datasets showed higher CNR (15.3 ± 7.3) compared to standard reconstructions (13.5 ± 6.5, p < 0.001). Both reconstructions showed comparable qualitative image quality scores (CS, 4.64; standard, 4.57; p = 0.220). Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) for CS reconstructions was 96.5% (97.5%, 95.6%, 90.9%, 98.1) and 93.1% (98.8%, 90.4%, 82.3%, 99.1%) for standard images. CONCLUSIONS: A modified three-material decomposition CS algorithm provides increased vascular CNR, equivalent qualitative image quality, and greater diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant arterial stenosis of the lower extremity runoff on DE-CTA compared with standard image reconstruction. KEY POINTS: • Calcified plaques may lead to overestimation of stenosis severity and false positive results, requiring additional invasive digital subtraction angiography (DSA). • A modified three-material decomposition algorithm for calcium subtraction provides greater diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant arterial stenosis of the lower extremity runoff compared with standard image reconstruction. • The application of this algorithm in patients with heavily calcified vessels may be helpful to potentially reduce inconclusive CT angiography examinations and the need for subsequent invasive DSA.
Authors: Rody Ouwendijk; Marc C J M Kock; Karen Visser; Peter M T Pattynama; Michiel W de Haan; Myriam G M Hunink Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Thorsten R C Johnson; Bernhard Krauss; Martin Sedlmair; Michael Grasruck; Herbert Bruder; Dominik Morhard; Christian Fink; Sabine Weckbach; Miriam Lenhard; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-12-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ruth P Lim; Elizabeth M Hecht; Jian Xu; James S Babb; Niels Oesingmann; Samson Wong; Bart E Muhs; Paul Gagne; Vivian S Lee Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Marc C J M Kock; Miraude E A P M Adriaensen; Peter M T Pattynama; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Hero van Urk; Theo Stijnen; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Rody Ouwendijk; Marianne de Vries; Peter M T Pattynama; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Michiel W de Haan; Theo Stijnen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Florian Schwarz; Balazs Ruzsics; U Joseph Schoepf; Gorka Bastarrika; Salvatore A Chiaramida; Joseph A Abro; Robin L Brothers; Sebastian Vogt; Bernhard Schmidt; Philip Costello; Peter L Zwerner Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2008-11-12 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Patrick Veit-Haibach; Martin W Huellner; Martin Banyai; Sebastian Mafeld; Johannes Heverhagen; Klaus Strobel; Bert-Ram Sah Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-02-06 Impact factor: 5.315