Julia Stehli1, Tobias A Fuchs1, Adrian Singer1, Sacha Bull1, Olivier F Clerc1, Mathias Possner1, Oliver Gaemperli2, Ronny R Buechel1, Philipp A Kaufmann3. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, NUK C 42, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland pak@usz.ch.
Abstract
AIMS: Single-source, dual-energy coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with monochromatic image reconstruction allows significant noise reduction. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of monochromatic CCTA image reconstruction on coronary stent imaging, as the latter is known to be affected by artefacts from highly attenuating strut material resulting in artificial luminal narrowing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with 62 stents underwent invasive coronary angiography and single-source, dual-energy CCTA after stent implantation. Standard polychromatic images as well as eight monochromatic series (50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 120, and 140 keV) were reconstructed for each CCTA. Signal and noise were measured within the stent lumen and in the aortic root. Mean in-stent luminal diameter was assessed in all CCTA reconstructions and compared with quantitative invasive coronary angiography (QCA). Luminal attenuation was higher in the stent than in the aortic root throughout all monochromatic reconstructions (P < 0.001). An increase in monochromatic energy was associated with a decrease in luminal attenuation values (P < 0.001). The mean in-stent luminal diameter underestimation by monochromatic CCTA compared with QCA was 90% at low monochromatic energy (50 keV) and improved to 37% at high monochromatic (140 keV) reconstruction while stent diameter was underestimated by 39% with standard CCTA. CONCLUSION: Monochromatic CCTA can be used reliably in patients with coronary stents. However, reconstructions with energies below 80 keV are not recommended as the blooming artefacts are most pronounced at such low energies, resulting in up to 90% stent diameter underestimation. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Single-source, dual-energy coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with monochromatic image reconstruction allows significant noise reduction. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of monochromatic CCTA image reconstruction on coronary stent imaging, as the latter is known to be affected by artefacts from highly attenuating strut material resulting in artificial luminal narrowing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with 62 stents underwent invasive coronary angiography and single-source, dual-energy CCTA after stent implantation. Standard polychromatic images as well as eight monochromatic series (50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 120, and 140 keV) were reconstructed for each CCTA. Signal and noise were measured within the stent lumen and in the aortic root. Mean in-stent luminal diameter was assessed in all CCTA reconstructions and compared with quantitative invasive coronary angiography (QCA). Luminal attenuation was higher in the stent than in the aortic root throughout all monochromatic reconstructions (P < 0.001). An increase in monochromatic energy was associated with a decrease in luminal attenuation values (P < 0.001). The mean in-stent luminal diameter underestimation by monochromatic CCTA compared with QCA was 90% at low monochromatic energy (50 keV) and improved to 37% at high monochromatic (140 keV) reconstruction while stent diameter was underestimated by 39% with standard CCTA. CONCLUSION: Monochromatic CCTA can be used reliably in patients with coronary stents. However, reconstructions with energies below 80 keV are not recommended as the blooming artefacts are most pronounced at such low energies, resulting in up to 90% stent diameter underestimation. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Stefanie Mangold; Paola M Cannaó; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Christian Canstein; Stephen R Fuller; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Akos Varga-Szemes; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Stefanie Mangold; Carlo N De Cecco; U Joseph Schoepf; Ricardo T Yamada; Akos Varga-Szemes; Andrew C Stubenrauch; Damiano Caruso; Stephen R Fuller; Thomas J Vogl; Konstantin Nikolaou; Thomas M Todoran; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jack W Lambert; Yuxin Sun; Karen G Ordovas; Robert G Gould; Sizhe Wang; Benjamin M Yeh Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2018 May/Jun Impact factor: 1.826