Literature DB >> 26949640

Corneal biomechanical properties changes after coaxial 2.2-mm microincision and standard 3.0-mm phacoemulsification.

Zhe Zhang1, Hua Yu2, Hui Dong2, Li Wang3, Ya-Ding Jia2, Su-Hua Zhang2.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the changes in corneal biomechanics measured by ocular response analyzer (ORA) after 2.2-mm microincision cataract surgery and 3.0-mm standard coaxial phacoemulsification.
METHODS: The prospective nonrandomized study comprised eyes with cataract that had 2.2-mm coaxial microincision or 3.0-mm standard incision phacoemulsification. The corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) were measured by ORA preoperatively and at 1d, 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-week postoperatively. Results were analyzed and compared between groups.
RESULTS: In both groups, CH decreased in the immediate postoperative period (P<0.05), returned to the preoperative level at one week (P=0.249) in the 2.2-mm group, and at two weeks in the 3.0-mm group (P=0.264); there was no significant change in CRF values. In 2.2-mm group, mean IOPcc and IOPg increased at 1d postoperatively (both P<0.05), and returned to preoperative level at one week (P=0.491 and P=0.923, respectively). In 3.0-mm group, mean IOPcc and IOPg increased at 1d and 1wk postoperatively (P=0.005 and P=0.029, respectively), and returned to preoperative level at 2wk (P=0.347 and P=0.887, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Significant differences between preoperative and postoperative corneal biomechanical values were found for CH, IOPcc and IOPg. But the recovery time courses were different between the two groups. The 2.2-mm coaxial microincision cataract surgery group seemed recovery faster compared to the 3.0-mm standard coaxial phacoemulsification group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2.2-mm microincision; coaxial microincision cataract surgery; corneal biomechanical parameters; time course

Year:  2016        PMID: 26949640      PMCID: PMC4761732          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.02.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  19 in total

1.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context.

Authors:  Mohammad Laiquzzaman; Rajan Bhojwani; Ian Cunliffe; Sunil Shah
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery.

Authors:  Annette Hager; Kristina Loge; Marc-Oliver Füllhas; Bernd Schroeder; Martin Grossherr; Wolfgang Wiegand
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Dolores Ortiz; David Piñero; Mohamed H Shabayek; Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Response of corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness following clear corneal cataract surgery.

Authors:  Artemios Kandarakis; Vasileios Soumplis; Michalis Karampelas; Ioannis Koutroumanos; Christos Panos; Stylianos Kandarakis; Dimitrios Karagiannis
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Central corneal thickness and biomechanical changes after clear corneal phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Bruno de Freitas Valbon; Marcelo Palis Ventura; Renata Siqueira da Silva; Ana Laura Canedo; Guillermo Coca Velarde; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kimiya Shimizu; Fumiko Ohmoto
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Sunil Shah; Mohammed Laiquzzaman; Rajan Bhojwani; Sanjay Mantry; Ian Cunliffe
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  María A del Buey; José A Cristóbal; Francisco J Ascaso; Laura Lavilla; Elena Lanchares
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  3 in total

1.  Correlations between corneal biomechanics and specular microscopy in patient with cataract.

Authors:  Raluca Claudia Iancu; Inna Adriana Bujor; Cătălina Iliuță; Ștefania Tudor; Emil Ungureanu; Irena Gabriela Pașca; Sînziana Istrate
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun

2.  Evaluation of corneal hysteresis after pars plana vitrectomy combined phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Manami Ohta; Makiko Wakuta; Ayano Sakuma; Mina Hasegawa; Waka Hamada; Fumiaki Higashijima; Takuya Yoshimoto; Tadahiko Ogata; Yuka Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Kimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The Effect of Strabismus Muscle Surgery on Corneal Biomechanics.

Authors:  Heba A El Gendy; Noha M Khalil; Iman M Eissa; Shireen Ma Shousha
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 1.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.