Literature DB >> 19835329

Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer.

Kazutaka Kamiya1, Kimiya Shimizu, Fumiko Ohmoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters in a normal population.
METHODS: We prospectively examined 204 normal eyes of 204 healthy Japanese volunteers (68 men, 136 women; mean age 46.7+/-19.4 years [range: 19 to 89 years]). Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOP(cc)), and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOP(G)) were qualitatively assessed using a Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Central corneal thickness was measured using an ultrasound pachymeter. This measurement was performed 3 times, and the mean value obtained was used for statistical analysis. The relationships between patient age and corneal biomechanical parameters, or age and intraocular pressure (IOP), were investigated.
RESULTS: Mean corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor were 10.1+/-1.5 mmHg and 10.1+/-1.6 mmHg, respectively. Mean central corneal thickness was 539.1+/-30.9 microm. A weak, but significant, negative correlation was found between age and corneal hysteresis (Pearson's correlation coefficient r=-0.17, P=.02) and corneal resistance factor (r=-0.18 P=.01). On the other hand, no significant correlation was found between age and central corneal thickness (r=-0.06, P=.41), age and IOP(cc) (r=-0.02, P=.82), or age and IOP(G) (r=-0.11, P=.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Corneal biomechanical parameters are significantly decreased by aging without significant changes in central corneal thickness or IOP, suggesting that age-related structural changes resulting from collagen cross-linking may lead to a reduction of corneal biomechanical variables independent of central corneal thickness or IOP. Copyright 2009, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19835329     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090917-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  32 in total

1.  Corneal biomechanical properties changes after coaxial 2.2-mm microincision and standard 3.0-mm phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Hua Yu; Hui Dong; Li Wang; Ya-Ding Jia; Su-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Evaluation of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Maria Gkika; Georgios Labiris; Athanassios Giarmoukakis; Anna Koutsogianni; Vassilios Kozobolis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Differences in the early biomechanical effects of hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Fabricio Witzel de Medeiros; Abhijit Sinha-Roy; Milton Ruiz Alves; Steven E Wilson; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy children.

Authors:  Ramin Salouti; Ali Agha Alishiri; Reza Gharebaghi; Mostafa Naderi; Khosrow Jadidi; Ahmad Shojaei-Baghini; Mohammadreza Talebnejad; Zahra Nasiri; Seyedmorteza Hosseini; Fatemeh Heidary
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Antiglaucoma drugs for achieving monovision after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02

Review 6.  Pediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sabrina Mukhtar; Balamurali K Ambati
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  The impact of central corneal thickness on the risk for glaucoma in a large multiethnic population.

Authors:  Sophia Y Wang; Ronald Melles; Shan C Lin
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Relationship between corneal hysteresis and optic nerve parameters measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Daniel M Vu; Fabiana Q Silva; Sarah J Haseltine; Joshua R Ehrlich; Nathan M Radcliffe
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and degree of myopia in an adult myopic population aged 20 to 40 years in southeast Spain: determination and relationships.

Authors:  Manuel Garcia-Medina; Jose Javier Garcia-Medina; Pablo Garrido-Fernandez; Jose Galvan-Espinosa; Jesus Martin-Molina; Carlos Garcia-Maturana; Sergio Perez-Pardo; Maria Dolores Pinazo-Duran
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-28

10.  The relationship between corneal hysteresis and the magnitude of intraocular pressure reduction with topical prostaglandin therapy.

Authors:  Daniel R Agarwal; Joshua R Ehrlich; Mitsugu Shimmyo; Nathan M Radcliffe
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.