Literature DB >> 16626423

Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context.

Mohammad Laiquzzaman1, Rajan Bhojwani, Ian Cunliffe, Sunil Shah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the diurnal variation in ocular hysteresis, as measured by the Ocular Response Analyser to establish a relationship between diurnal hysteresis variation and diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) variation.
METHODS: Forty-two normal eyes of 21 colleagues and staff in a teaching hospital in Birmingham, UK, were recruited. The IOP and hysteresis were measured by the Ocular Response Analyser. The central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using a hand-held ultrasonic pachymeter in the mid-pupillary axis.
RESULTS: The mean ocular hysteresis at 8 am was 12.7 +/- 2.3 mmHg, at 11 am was 12.2 +/- 2.0 mmHg, at 2 PM was 12.7 +/- 2.1 mmHg and at 5 PM was 12.7 +/- 1.7 mmHg; the difference between the values at any time of measurement was not statistically significant (P > 0.9, repeated measures). IOP as measured by non-contact tonometry was 18.4 +/- 2.8 mmHg, 17.9 +/- 3.3 mmHg, 16.9 +/- 3.1 mmHg and 16.8 +/- 3.2 mmHg, respectively, for the same time period; the difference between the values in the morning and afternoon was statistically significant (P < 0.0001, repeated measures). The CCT was 548.8 +/- 29.5 microm, 547.0 +/- 31.4 microm, 548.2 +/- 29.6 microm and 548.6 +/- 29.4 microm, respectively; the difference between the values was not statistically significant at any time points. Multiple regression analysis showed the relationship between IOP and hysteresis was not statistically significant (P = 0.9).
CONCLUSION: The ocular hysteresis reading was almost constant throughout the day, whereas the IOP readings showed highest values in the morning with a reducing trend being lowest in the afternoon. The CCT values were almost stable throughout the day. IOP appears to vary independently of a variation in hysteresis or CCT.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16626423     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01185.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  17 in total

1.  In-vivo corneal biomechanical analysis of unilateral keratoconus.

Authors:  Orhan Ayar; Mehmet Cuneyt Ozmen; Orkun Muftuoglu; Mehmet Orcun Akdemir; Mustafa Koc; Kemal Ozulken
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Corneal biomechanical properties changes after coaxial 2.2-mm microincision and standard 3.0-mm phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Hua Yu; Hui Dong; Li Wang; Ya-Ding Jia; Su-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Corneal hysteresis in patients with dry eye.

Authors:  P G Firat; S Doganay
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Keratoconus and normal-tension glaucoma: a study of the possible association with abnormal biomechanical properties as measured by corneal hysteresis (An AOS Thesis).

Authors:  Elisabeth J Cohen
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2009-12

5.  Repeatability of Corneal Hysteresis Measurements in Glaucoma Patients During Routine Follow Up and After Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Tzukit Zehavi-Dorin; Anne E Kutzscher; Mai Badr; Marta Mora; Yennie Shyu; Travis C Porco; Robert L Stamper
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.290

6.  Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed.

Authors:  Ying Hong; Nobuyuki Shoji; Tetsuya Morita; Kazunori Hirasawa; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Masayuki Kasahara; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Changes of extracellular matrix of the cornea in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A Hager; K Wegscheider; W Wiegand
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Lower corneal hysteresis in glaucoma patients with acquired pit of the optic nerve (APON).

Authors:  Frank Bochmann; Ghee S Ang; Augusto Azuara-Blanco
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure].

Authors:  A Hager; B Schroeder; M Sadeghi; M Grossherr; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  [Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes].

Authors:  E Spörl; N Terai; M Haustein; A G Böhm; F Raiskup-Wolf; L E Pillunat
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.