Literature DB >> 15721707

Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.

Jun Liu1, Cynthia J Roberts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand and quantify intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement errors introduced by corneal variables during applanation tonometry using a cornea biomechanical model.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Biomedical Engineering Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
METHODS: The model assumed an overall resultant pressure that was based on the summation of the applanation pressure, the true IOP, and the surface tension caused by the tear film to determine the final deformation of the corneal apex during IOP measurement. Corneal resistance was varied according to the cornea's biomechanical properties, thickness, and curvature, and the effect of each variable on the accuracy of IOP tonometry readings was examined quantitatively.
RESULTS: The model demonstrated that tonometry readings do not always reflect true IOP values. They deviate when corneal thickness, curvature, or biomechanical properties vary from normal values. Based on the model, predicted IOP readings have a 2.87 mm Hg range resulting from the variation in the corneal thickness in the normal population and a 1.76 mm Hg range from the variation in the corneal radius of curvature. Considering that Young's modulus of the corneal varies from 0.1 to 0.9 MPa in the normal population, the model predicts tonometry IOP readings will have a range of 17.26 mm Hg because of the variation in this corneal biomechanical parameter alone.
CONCLUSIONS: The simulation based on the model demonstrated quantitatively that variations in each corneal variable cause errors in tonometry IOP readings. The simulation results indicate that differences in corneal biomechanics across individuals may have greater impact on IOP measurement errors than corneal thickness or curvature.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15721707     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  183 in total

1.  Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties between healthy blacks and whites using the Ocular Response Analyzer.

Authors:  Mauro T Leite; Luciana M Alencar; Charlotte Gore; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Brillouin optical microscopy for corneal biomechanics.

Authors:  Giuliano Scarcelli; Roberto Pineda; Seok Hyun Yun
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Nonlinear optical macroscopic assessment of 3-D corneal collagen organization and axial biomechanics.

Authors:  Moritz Winkler; Dongyul Chai; Shelsea Kriling; Chyong Jy Nien; Donald J Brown; Bryan Jester; Tibor Juhasz; James V Jester
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  [Tonometry in change. From indentation and applanation to contour adaptation].

Authors:  H Kanngiesser; C Kniestedt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility.

Authors:  Sonja Herdener; Mona Pache; Sonja Lautebach; Jens Funk
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea.

Authors:  William J Dupps; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Underestimation of intraocular pressure after photorefractive keratectomy: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Per Hallberg; Anders Eklund; Kenneth Santala; Timo Koskela; Olof Lindahl; Christina Lindén
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Method for optical coherence elastography of the cornea.

Authors:  Matthew R Ford; William J Dupps; Andrew M Rollins; Roy A Sinha; Zhilin Hu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Corneal biomechanical properties measured by the ocular response analyzer in acromegalic patients.

Authors:  Emine Sen; Yasemin Tutuncu; Melike Balikoglu-Yilmaz; Ufuk Elgin; Dilek Berker; Faruk Ozturk; Serdar Guler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  High-resolution acoustic-radiation-force-impulse imaging for assessing corneal sclerosis.

Authors:  Cho-Chiang Shih; Chih-Chung Huang; Qifa Zhou; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.