John Hoffman1, Stefano Young2, Frédéric Noo3, Michael McNitt-Gray1. 1. Departments of Biomedical Physics and Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90024. 2. Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90024. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112.
Abstract
PURPOSE: With growing interest in quantitative imaging, radiomics, and CAD using CT imaging, the need to explore the impacts of acquisition and reconstruction parameters has grown. This usually requires extensive access to the scanner on which the data were acquired and its workflow is not designed for large-scale reconstruction projects. Therefore, the authors have developed a freely available, open-source software package implementing a common reconstruction method, weighted filtered backprojection (wFBP), for helical fan-beam CT applications. METHODS: FreeCT_wFBP is a low-dependency, GPU-based reconstruction program utilizing c for the host code and Nvidia CUDA C for GPU code. The software is capable of reconstructing helical scans acquired with arbitrary pitch-values, and sampling techniques such as flying focal spots and a quarter-detector offset. In this work, the software has been described and evaluated for reconstruction speed, image quality, and accuracy. Speed was evaluated based on acquisitions of the ACR CT accreditation phantom under four different flying focal spot configurations. Image quality was assessed using the same phantom by evaluating CT number accuracy, uniformity, and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). Finally, reconstructed mass-attenuation coefficient accuracy was evaluated using a simulated scan of a FORBILD thorax phantom and comparing reconstructed values to the known phantom values. RESULTS: The average reconstruction time evaluated under all flying focal spot configurations was found to be 17.4 ± 1.0 s for a 512 row × 512 column × 32 slice volume. Reconstructions of the ACR phantom were found to meet all CT Accreditation Program criteria including CT number, CNR, and uniformity tests. Finally, reconstructed mass-attenuation coefficient values of water within the FORBILD thorax phantom agreed with original phantom values to within 0.0001 mm(2)/g (0.01%). CONCLUSIONS: FreeCT_wFBP is a fast, highly configurable reconstruction package for third-generation CT available under the GNU GPL. It shows good performance with both clinical and simulated data.
PURPOSE: With growing interest in quantitative imaging, radiomics, and CAD using CT imaging, the need to explore the impacts of acquisition and reconstruction parameters has grown. This usually requires extensive access to the scanner on which the data were acquired and its workflow is not designed for large-scale reconstruction projects. Therefore, the authors have developed a freely available, open-source software package implementing a common reconstruction method, weighted filtered backprojection (wFBP), for helical fan-beam CT applications. METHODS: FreeCT_wFBP is a low-dependency, GPU-based reconstruction program utilizing c for the host code and Nvidia CUDA C for GPU code. The software is capable of reconstructing helical scans acquired with arbitrary pitch-values, and sampling techniques such as flying focal spots and a quarter-detector offset. In this work, the software has been described and evaluated for reconstruction speed, image quality, and accuracy. Speed was evaluated based on acquisitions of the ACR CT accreditation phantom under four different flying focal spot configurations. Image quality was assessed using the same phantom by evaluating CT number accuracy, uniformity, and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). Finally, reconstructed mass-attenuation coefficient accuracy was evaluated using a simulated scan of a FORBILD thorax phantom and comparing reconstructed values to the known phantom values. RESULTS: The average reconstruction time evaluated under all flying focal spot configurations was found to be 17.4 ± 1.0 s for a 512 row × 512 column × 32 slice volume. Reconstructions of the ACR phantom were found to meet all CT Accreditation Program criteria including CT number, CNR, and uniformity tests. Finally, reconstructed mass-attenuation coefficient values of water within the FORBILD thorax phantom agreed with original phantom values to within 0.0001 mm(2)/g (0.01%). CONCLUSIONS: FreeCT_wFBP is a fast, highly configurable reconstruction package for third-generation CT available under the GNU GPL. It shows good performance with both clinical and simulated data.
Authors: Stefano Young; Hyun J Grace Kim; Moe Moe Ko; War War Ko; Carlos Flores; Michael F McNitt-Gray Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Matthew S Brown; Pechin Lo; Jonathan G Goldin; Eran Barnoy; Grace Hyun J Kim; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Denise R Aberle Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Thibaud P Coroller; Patrick Grossmann; Ying Hou; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Gretchen Hermann; Philippe Lambin; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Raymond H Mak; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Donald P Frush; Christopher C Slack; Caroline L Hollingsworth; George S Bisset; Lane F Donnelly; Jiang Hsieh; Trudy Lavin-Wensell; John R Mayo Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ehsan Abadi; Brian Harrawood; Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; William P Segars; Ehsan Samei Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: John Hoffman; Nastaran Emaminejad; Muhammad Wahi-Anwar; Grace H Kim; Matthew Brown; Stefano Young; Michael McNitt-Gray Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Gaofeng Chen; Yongbo Wang; Zhaoying Bian; Ziquan Wei; Yaohong Deng; Mingqiang Li; Kun Ma; Xi Tao; Bin Li; Jianhua Ma; Jing Huang Journal: Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao Date: 2019-10-30
Authors: Ehsan Abadi; Brian Harrawood; Jayasai R Rajagopal; Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; William Paul Segars; Karl Stierstorfer; Martin Sedlmair; Elizabeth Jones; Ehsan Samei Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Date: 2019-08-09
Authors: Nastaran Emaminejad; Muhammad Wasil Wahi-Anwar; Grace Hyun J Kim; William Hsu; Matthew Brown; Michael McNitt-Gray Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 4.506