Literature DB >> 26929559

A Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Titanium Versus 2-Dimensional Titanium Miniplates for Open Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphysis Fracture.

Yogesh Mittal1, K George Varghese2, S Mohan2, N Jayakumar2, Somil Chhag2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Three dimensional titanium plating system was developed by Farmand in 1995 to meet the requirements of semi rigid fixation with lesser complication. The purpose of this in vivo prospective study was to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of three dimensional and two dimensional Titanium miniplates for open reduction and fixation of mandibular parasymphysis fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with non-comminuted mandibular parasymphysis fractures were divided randomly into two equal groups and were treated with 2 mm 3D and 2D miniplate system respectively. All patients were systematically monitored at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th week, 3rd and 6th month postoperatively. The outcome parameters recorded were severity of pain, infection, mobility, occlusion derangement, paresthesia and implant failure. The data so collected was analyzed using independent t test and Chi square test (α = .05).
RESULTS: The results showed that one patient in each group had post-operative infection, occlusion derangement and mobility (p > .05). In Group A, one patient had paresthesia while in Group B, two patients had paresthesia (p > .05). None of the patients in both the groups had implant failure. There was no statistically significant difference between 3D and 2D miniplate system in all the recorded parameters at all the follow-ups (p > .05).
CONCLUSION: 3D miniplates were found to be better than 2D miniplates in terms of cost, ease of surgery and operative time. However, 3D miniplates were unfavorable for cases where fracture line was oblique and in close proximity to mental foramen, where they were difficult to adapt and more chances for tooth-root damage and inadvertent injury to the mental nerve due to traction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mandibular parasymphysis fracture; Open reduction and internal fixation; Three dimensional titanium miniplate (3D); Two dimensional titanium miniplate (2D)

Year:  2015        PMID: 26929559      PMCID: PMC4759031          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-015-0780-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  16 in total

1.  [The value of 3-dimensional plates in maxillofacial surgery].

Authors:  M Farmand; L Dupoirieux
Journal:  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac       Date:  1992

2.  Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Andrew J L Gear; Elena Apasova; John P Schmitz; Warren Schubert
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Mandibular fractures: Historical perspective.

Authors:  R Mukerji; G Mukerji; M McGurk
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of new fixation devices for mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  J M Wittenberg; D P Mukherjee; B R Smith; R N Kruse
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  "A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  K Vineeth; R M Lalitha; Kavitha Prasad; K Ranganath; V Shwetha; Jasmeet Singh
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Fixation of mandibular fractures with 2.0-mm miniplates: review of 191 cases.

Authors:  Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli; Mário Francisco Real Gabrielli; Elcio Marcantonio; Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  A short period of maxillomandibular fixation for treatment of fractures of the mandibular tooth-bearing area.

Authors:  Fouad A Al-Belasy
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Comparison of 3-dimensional and standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Jain; K S Manjunath; B K Bhagwan; Dipit K Shah
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Use of straight and curved 3-dimensional titanium miniplates for fracture fixation at the mandibular angle.

Authors:  Juergen Zix; Olivier Lieger; Tateyuki Iizuka
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Infection rate in mandibular angle fractures treated with a 2.0-mm 8-hole curved strut plate.

Authors:  Peter Bui; Nagi Demian; Patrick Beetar
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison Between Conventional Titanium Miniplates and Indigenous Detachable Custom made 3D Titanium Plates (VAS 3D Bone Plate) for Fixation of Mandibular Fracture in Mental Foramen Region: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Sanchita Thapliyal; Apoorva Mowar; Vishal Bansal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-06-26

2.  Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate, lag screws versus miniplates, locking plate versus non-locking miniplates: Management of mandibular fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patiguli Wusiman; Dilidaer Taxifulati; Li Weidong; Adili Moming
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  Effectiveness of placement of second miniplates as tension band unit in mandibular parasymphysis fractures.

Authors:  Javad Yazdani; MohamadAli Ghavimi; Mahsa Taghizadeh; Yousef Kananizadeh; Milad Ghanizadeh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 May-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.