Literature DB >> 12684959

Fixation of mandibular fractures with 2.0-mm miniplates: review of 191 cases.

Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli1, Mário Francisco Real Gabrielli, Elcio Marcantonio, Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to study the use of 2.0-mm miniplates for the fixation of mandibular fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 191 patients who experienced a total of 280 mandibular fractures that were treated with 2.0-mm miniplates were reviewed. One hundred twelve of those patients, presenting 160 fractures, who attended a late follow-up were also clinically evaluated. Miniplates were used in the same positions described by AO/ASIF. No intermaxillary fixation was used. All patients included had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Demographic data, procedures, postoperative results, and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Mandibular fractures occurred mainly in males (mean age, 30.3 years). Mean follow-up was 21.92 months. The main etiology was motor vehicle accident. The most common fracture was the angle fracture (28.21%). Twenty-two fractures developed infection, for an overall incidence of 7.85%. When only angle fractures are considered, that incidence is increased to 18.98%. Although only 1 patient (0.89%) described inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia, objective testing revealed sensitivity alterations in 31.52% of the patients who had fractures in regions related to the inferior alveolar nerve. Temporary mild deficit of the marginal mandibular branch was observed in 2.56% of the extraoral approaches performed and 2.48% presented with hypertrophic scars. Incidence of occlusal alterations was 4.0%. Facial asymmetry was observed in 2.67% of the patients, whereas malunion incidence was 1.78%. Fibrous union, mostly partial, occurred in 2.38% of the fractures, but only 1 of those presented with mobility (0.59%). Condylar resorption developed in 6.25% of the fixated condylar fractures. Mean mouth opening was 42.08 mm.
CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of complications, including infections, was similar to those described for more rigid methods of fixation. Copyright 2003 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:430-436, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12684959     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2003.50083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  36 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of 3d Locking Versus Non-Locking Titanium Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fracture.

Authors:  Mohsin Khan; Ashish Kumar; Tanya Khaitan; Dharmendra Kumar Sinha; Chandan Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-20

2.  Mandibular fracture scoring system: for prediction of complications.

Authors:  D Prabhu Shankar; P Manodh; Pradeep Devadoss; Titus K Thomas
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-04-28

3.  Bone repair in mandibular body osteotomy after using 2.0 miniplate system--histological and histometric analysis in dogs.

Authors:  Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Marina Amaral Lucas; Alexander Tadeu Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato; Marcio Mateus Beloti; Adalberto Luiz Rosa; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Prospective study of postoperative sensory disturbances after surgical treatment of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Gabriela Mayrink; Roger William Fernandes Moreira; Marcelo Marotta Araujo
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-05-03

5.  A Comparative Evaluation of Fixation Techniques in Anterior Mandibular Fractures Using 2.0 mm Monocortical Titanium Miniplates Versus 2.4 mm Cortical Titanium Lag Screws.

Authors:  Manoj Goyal; Aakarsh Jhamb; Sonia Chawla; Karan Marya; J S Dua; Suman Yadav
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-03-27

6.  Review of Maxillofacial Hardware Complications and Indications for Salvage.

Authors:  Jonatan Hernandez Rosa; Nathaniel L Villanueva; Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy; Stephanie H Factor; Peter J Taub
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-12-22

7.  Biomechanical comparison of four mandibular angle fracture fixation techniques.

Authors:  Jose Luis Muñante-Cardenas; Luis Augusto Passeri
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-20

8.  Comparison of 2 mm single locking miniplates versus 2 mm two non-locking miniplates in symphysis and parasymphysis fracture of mandible.

Authors:  Arpit Vashistha; Manpreet Singh; Manoj Chaudhary; Nimish Agarwal; Gagandeep Kaur
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2016-02-01

9.  A Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Titanium Versus 2-Dimensional Titanium Miniplates for Open Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphysis Fracture.

Authors:  Yogesh Mittal; K George Varghese; S Mohan; N Jayakumar; Somil Chhag
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-03-27

10.  Evaluating the Effect of Minimizing Screws on Stabilization of Symphysis Mandibular Fracture by 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Ghias Kharmanda; Mohamed-Yaser Kharma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.