Literature DB >> 22809633

"A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study.

K Vineeth1, R M Lalitha, Kavitha Prasad, K Ranganath, V Shwetha, Jasmeet Singh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare efficacy between the single non-compression titanium miniplate and single three-dimensional titanium miniplate in mandibular angle fracture treatment. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A prospective study of 20 patients with mandibular angle fractures. Patients were randomly categorized into two groups with 10 patients in each group. Group-I patients were treated with single 2.0mm conventional titanium miniplate, Group-II patients were treated with single 2.0mm three-dimensional titanium miniplate according to Champy's principles. Parameters such as stability of fracture fragments, occlusion, mouth opening, additional fixation required and complications were evaluated at different time intervals.
RESULTS: In Group-I, about 40% (n=4) of patients showed unstable fracture fragments on immediate postoperative day whereas in Group-II only 10% (n=1) of patients with fracture instability. In Group-I, 30% (n=3) had mild occlusal derangement and 20% (n=2) had deranged occlusion on immediate postoperative day, where as in Group-II only 20% (n=2) of patients had mild occlusal derangement. Additional fixation required in 30% (n=3) of patients in group-I, and 10% (n=1) in Group-II. 20% (n=2) of patients in Group-I developed infection. All patients in both the groups had inadequate mouth opening on immediate post operative day, later resumed normal mouth opening. 10% (n=1) in group-I and 20% (n=2) of patients in group-II presented with postinjury/preoperative inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance with no incidence of postoperative sensory disturbance. None of the patients in both the groups had malunion, nonunion, plate fracture, and loosening of plates and screws.
CONCLUSION: 3-D titanium miniplates showed more favorable results compared to single conventional titanium miniplate with respect to initial interfragmentary stability and complications.
Copyright © 2012 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22809633     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  15 in total

1.  A Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Titanium Versus 2-Dimensional Titanium Miniplates for Open Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphysis Fracture.

Authors:  Yogesh Mittal; K George Varghese; S Mohan; N Jayakumar; Somil Chhag
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-03-27

2.  Comparison of single versus two non-compression miniplates in the management of unfavourable angle fracture of the mandible: a prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Anshul Rai; Anuj Jain; Abhay Datarkar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-02-19

3.  Complication rate in mandibular angle fractures-one vs. two plates: a 12-year retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Raphael Ferrari; M Lanzer; D Wiedemeier; M Rücker; M Bredell
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures: Single Stainless Steel Linear Miniplate Versus Rectangular Grid Plate-A Prospective Randomised Study.

Authors:  Sridhar Reddy Kanubaddy; Sathya Kumar Devireddy; Kishore Kumar Rayadurgam; Rajsekhar Gali; Mallikarjun Rao Dasari; Sivaganesh Pampana
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  Comparison Between Conventional Titanium Miniplates and Indigenous Detachable Custom made 3D Titanium Plates (VAS 3D Bone Plate) for Fixation of Mandibular Fracture in Mental Foramen Region: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Sanchita Thapliyal; Apoorva Mowar; Vishal Bansal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-06-26

6.  The Efficacy of Fixation of Unilateral Mandibular Angle Fracture with Single 3D Plate vs Single Miniplate Using Transbuccal Approach.

Authors:  Nancy Mathew; Inderjot Singh; Sumir Gandhi; Manisha Solanki; Navpreet Singh Bedi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-10-19

7.  Management of mandibular angle fractures using a 1.7 mm 3-dimensional strut plate.

Authors:  Varnika Pandey; Ongkila Bhutia; Shakil Ahmed Nagori; Ashu Seith; Ajoy Roychoudhury
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 8.  Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: clinical studies.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-11-24

9.  3-D Miniplates Versus Conventional Miniplates in Treatment of Mandible Fractures.

Authors:  Niranjan Mishra; Nirav Thakkar; Indubhusan Kar; Shadab Ali Baig; Gaurav Sharma; Rosalin Kar; Gyana Ranjan Sahu; Krishna Gopal Birmiwal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-12-14

10.  Routine removal of the plate after surgical treatment for mandibular angle fracture with a third molar in relation to the fracture line.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Yumiko Matsusue; Satoshi Horita; Kazuhiro Murakami; Tsutomu Sugiura; Tadaaki Kirita
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.