Literature DB >> 26875950

Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

Caitlin Parks1, Jeffrey F Peipert2.   

Abstract

Significant public health disparities exist surrounding teen and unplanned pregnancy in the United States. Women of color and those with lower education and socioeconomic status are at much greater risk of unplanned pregnancy and the resulting adverse outcomes. Unplanned pregnancies reduce educational and career opportunities and may contribute to socioeconomic deprivation and widening income disparities. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including intrauterine devices and implants, offer the opportunity to change the default from drifting into parenthood to planned conception. LARC methods are forgettable; once placed, they offer highly effective, long-term pregnancy prevention. Increasing evidence in the medical literature demonstrates the population benefits of use of these methods. However, barriers to more widespread use of LARC methods persist and include educational, access, and cost barriers. With increasing insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act and more widespread, no-cost coverage of methods, more and more women are choosing intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant. Increasing the use of highly effective contraceptive methods may provide one solution to the persistent problem of the health disparities of unplanned and teen pregnancies in the United States and improve women's and children's health.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implants; intrauterine devices; long-acting reversible contraception; unplanned pregnancy; women’s health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26875950      PMCID: PMC4884485          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  58 in total

1.  Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  J Trussell; B Vaughan
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

2.  Effects of various IUDs on the composition of cervical mucus.

Authors:  B Jonsson; B M Landgren; P Eneroth
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  IUD use and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  X Xiong; P Buekens; E Wollast
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women.

Authors:  D Hubacher; R Lara-Ricalde; D J Taylor; F Guerra-Infante; R Guzmán-Rodríguez
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Intrauterine device and upper-genital-tract infection.

Authors:  D A Grimes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-16       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system.

Authors:  Tiina Backman; Sakke Huhtala; Riitta Luoto; Juhani Tuominen; Ilkka Rauramo; Markku Koskenvuo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Veronica Reyes; Sonia Lillo; Ana Zepeda; Pai-Lien Chen; Horacio Croxatto
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective.

Authors:  T M Farley; M J Rosenberg; P J Rowe; J H Chen; O Meirik
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Committee Opinion No. 654: Reproductive Life Planning to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Copper-T intrauterine device and levonorgestrel intrauterine system: biological bases of their mechanism of action.

Authors:  María Elena Ortiz; Horacio B Croxatto
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  24 in total

1.  Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2014.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Jill Shah; Michele G Mandel; Jamie W Krashin; Danielle B Suchdev; Denise J Jamieson; Karen Pazol
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-11-23

2.  Coverage of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception has improved birth intervals for at-risk populations.

Authors:  Abigail Liberty; Kimberly Yee; Blair G Darney; Ana Lopez-Defede; Maria I Rodriguez
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Contraceptive Method Use During the Community-Wide HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanders; Kyl Myers; Lori M Gawron; Rebecca G Simmons; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Failure to monitor or prevent unintended pregnancy is the key intergenerational problem, not the pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Wendy V Norman; Sarah Munro
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Household income and contraceptive methods among female youth: a cross-sectional study using the Canadian Community Health Survey (2009-2010 and 2013-2014).

Authors:  Elizabeth Nethery; Laura Schummers; K Suzanne Maginley; Sheila Dunn; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2019-11-04

6.  Access to long-acting reversible contraception among US publicly funded health centers.

Authors:  Marta Bornstein; Marion Carter; Lauren Zapata; Loretta Gavin; Susan Moskosky
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Postpartum contraceptive use and interpregnancy interval among women with opioid use disorder.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Joo Yeon Kim; Alton Everette James; David K Kelley; Marian Jarlenski
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and unintended pregnancy in women with disabilities.

Authors:  Jeanne L Alhusen; Tina Bloom; Jacqueline Anderson; Rosemary B Hughes
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.554

9.  The Affordable Care Act contraception mandate & unintended pregnancy in women of reproductive age: An analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2008-2010 v. 2013-2015.

Authors:  Colleen L MacCallum-Bridges; Claire E Margerison
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maegan E Boutot; Michele G Mandel; Maura K Whiteman; Angeline Ti; Emily Petersen; Karen Pazol
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.