Marta Bornstein1, Marion Carter2, Lauren Zapata3, Loretta Gavin4, Susan Moskosky4. 1. Oak Ridge Institute for Research and Education, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: Martabornstein@gmail.com. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Atlanta, GA. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health, Atlanta, GA. 4. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs, Washington DC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Access to a full range of contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), is central to providing quality family planning services. We describe health center-related factors associated with LARC availability, including staff training in LARC insertion/removal and approaches to offering LARC, whether onsite or through referral. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed nationally representative survey data collected during 2013-2014 from administrators of publicly funded U.S. health centers that offered family planning. The response rate was 49.3% (n=1615). In addition to descriptive statistics, we used multivariable logistic regression to identify health center characteristics associated with offering both IUDs and implants onsite. RESULTS: Two-thirds (64%) of health centers had staff trained in all three LARC types (hormonal IUD, copper IUD, implant); 21% had no staff trained in any of those contraceptive methods. Half of health centers (52%) offered IUDs (any type) and implants onsite. After onsite provision, informal referral arrangements were the most common way LARC methods were offered. In adjusted analyses, Planned Parenthood (AOR=9.49) and hospital-based (AOR=2.35) health centers had increased odds of offering IUDs (any type) and implants onsite, compared to Health Departments, as did Title X-funded (AOR=1.55) compared to non-Title X-funded health centers and centers serving a larger volume of family planning clients. Centers serving mostly rural areas compared to those serving urbans areas had lower odds (AOR 0.60) of offering IUD (any type) and implants. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in LARC access remains among publicly funded health centers. In particular, Health Departments and rural health centers have relatively low LARC provision. IMPLICATIONS: For more women to be offered a full range of contraceptive methods, additional efforts should be made to increase availability of LARC in publicly-funded health centers, such as addressing provider training gaps, improving referrals mechanisms, and other efforts to strengthen the health care system.
OBJECTIVES: Access to a full range of contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), is central to providing quality family planning services. We describe health center-related factors associated with LARC availability, including staff training in LARC insertion/removal and approaches to offering LARC, whether onsite or through referral. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed nationally representative survey data collected during 2013-2014 from administrators of publicly funded U.S. health centers that offered family planning. The response rate was 49.3% (n=1615). In addition to descriptive statistics, we used multivariable logistic regression to identify health center characteristics associated with offering both IUDs and implants onsite. RESULTS: Two-thirds (64%) of health centers had staff trained in all three LARC types (hormonal IUD, copper IUD, implant); 21% had no staff trained in any of those contraceptive methods. Half of health centers (52%) offered IUDs (any type) and implants onsite. After onsite provision, informal referral arrangements were the most common way LARC methods were offered. In adjusted analyses, Planned Parenthood (AOR=9.49) and hospital-based (AOR=2.35) health centers had increased odds of offering IUDs (any type) and implants onsite, compared to Health Departments, as did Title X-funded (AOR=1.55) compared to non-Title X-funded health centers and centers serving a larger volume of family planning clients. Centers serving mostly rural areas compared to those serving urbans areas had lower odds (AOR 0.60) of offering IUD (any type) and implants. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in LARC access remains among publicly funded health centers. In particular, Health Departments and rural health centers have relatively low LARC provision. IMPLICATIONS: For more women to be offered a full range of contraceptive methods, additional efforts should be made to increase availability of LARC in publicly-funded health centers, such as addressing provider training gaps, improving referrals mechanisms, and other efforts to strengthen the health care system.
Authors: Noah Ivers; Gro Jamtvedt; Signe Flottorp; Jane M Young; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Simon D French; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marit Johansen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Andrew D Oxman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-06-13
Authors: Cynthia C Harper; Jillian T Henderson; Tina R Raine; Suzan Goodman; Philip D Darney; Kirsten M Thompson; Christine Dehlendorf; J Joseph Speidel Journal: Fam Med Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Jeffrey F Peipert Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Colleen McNicholas; Jennifer Mullersman; Christina M Buckel; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kathryn M Curtis; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui; Erin Berry-Bibee; Leah G Horton; Lauren B Zapata; Katharine B Simmons; H Pamela Pagano; Denise J Jamieson; Maura K Whiteman Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2016-07-29
Authors: Cynthia C Harper; Maya Blum; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Philip D Darney; J Joseph Speidel; Michael Policar; Eleanor A Drey Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Abigail Liberty; Kimberly Yee; Blair G Darney; Ana Lopez-Defede; Maria I Rodriguez Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-12-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Erika Cottrell; Blair G Darney; Miguel Marino; Anna Rose Templeton; Lorie Jacob; Megan Hoopes; Maria Rodriguez; Brigit Hatch Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2019-06-11
Authors: Blair G Darney; R Lorie Jacob; Megan Hoopes; Maria I Rodriguez; Brigit Hatch; Miguel Marino; Anna Templeton; Jee Oakley; Erika K Cottrell Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-06-01
Authors: Liane M Ventura; Kate E Beatty; Amal J Khoury; Michael G Smith; Oluwatosin Ariyo; Deborah L Slawson; Amy J Weber Journal: Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) Date: 2021-12-15
Authors: Cynthia C Harper; Alison B Comfort; Maya Blum; Corinne H Rocca; Charles E McCulloch; Lavanya Rao; Nishant Shah; Helen Oquendo Del Toro; Suzan Goodman Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 4.637