Literature DB >> 30462632

Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2015.

Tara C Jatlaoui1, Maegan E Boutot1,2, Michele G Mandel1, Maura K Whiteman1, Angeline Ti1, Emily Petersen1, Karen Pazol1.   

Abstract

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Since 1969, CDC has conducted abortion surveillance to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions in the United States. PERIOD COVERED: 2015. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: Each year, CDC requests abortion data from the central health agencies of 52 reporting areas (the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City). The reporting areas provide this information voluntarily. For 2015, data were received from 49 reporting areas. Abortion data provided by these 49 reporting areas for each year during 2006-2015 were used in trend analyses. Census and natality data were used to calculate abortion rates (number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years) and ratios (number of abortions per 1,000 live births), respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 638,169 abortions for 2015 were reported to CDC from 49 reporting areas. Among these 49 reporting areas, the abortion rate for 2015 was 11.8 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years, and the abortion ratio was 188 abortions per 1,000 live births. From 2014 to 2015, the total number of reported abortions decreased 2% (from 652,639), the abortion rate decreased 2% (from 12.1 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and the abortion ratio decreased 2% (from 192 abortions per 1,000 live births). From 2006 to 2015, the total number of reported abortions decreased 24% (from 842,855), the abortion rate decreased 26% (from 15.9 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and the abortion ratio decreased 19% (from 233 abortions per 1,000 live births). In 2015, all three measures reached their lowest level for the entire period of analysis (2006-2015). In 2015 and throughout the period of analysis, women in their 20s accounted for the majority of abortions and had the highest abortion rates; women aged ≥30 years accounted for a smaller percentage of abortions and had lower abortion rates. In 2015, women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years accounted for 31.1% and 27.6% of all reported abortions, respectively, and had abortion rates of 19.9 and 17.9 abortions per 1,000 women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years, respectively. In contrast, women aged 30-34, 35-39, and ≥40 years accounted for 17.7%, 10.0%, and 3.5% of all reported abortions, respectively, and had abortion rates of 11.6, 7.0, and 2.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged 30-34, 35-39, and ≥40 years, respectively. From 2006 to 2015, the abortion rate decreased among women in all age groups. In 2015, adolescents aged <15 and 15-19 years accounted for 0.3% and 9.8% of all reported abortions, respectively, and had abortion rates of 0.5 and 6.7 abortions per 1,000 adolescents aged <15 and 15-19 years, respectively. From 2006 to 2015, the percentage of abortions accounted for by adolescents aged 15-19 years decreased 41%, and their abortion rate decreased 54%. This decrease in abortion rate was greater than the decreases for women in any older age group. In contrast to the percentage distribution of abortions and abortion rates by age, abortion ratios in 2015 and throughout the entire period of analysis were highest among adolescents and lowest among women aged 25-39 years. Abortion ratios decreased from 2006 to 2015 for women in all age groups. In 2015, almost two thirds (65.4%) of abortions were performed at ≤8 weeks' gestation, and nearly all (91.1%) were performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation. Few abortions were performed between 14 and 20 weeks' gestation (7.6%) or at ≥21 weeks' gestation (1.3%). During 2006-2015 the percentage of all abortions performed at >13 weeks' gestation remained consistently low (≤9.0%). Among abortions performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation, a shift occurred toward earlier gestational ages, with the percentage performed at ≤6 weeks' gestation increasing 11%. In 2015, 24.6% of all abortions were performed by early medical abortion (a nonsurgical abortion at ≤8 weeks' gestation), 64.3% were performed by surgical abortion at ≤13 weeks' gestation, and 8.8% were performed by surgical abortion at >13 weeks' gestation; all other methods were uncommon (≤2.2%). Among those that were eligible for early medical abortion on the basis of gestational age (i.e., performed at ≤8 weeks' gestation), 35.8% were completed by this method. In 2015, women with one or more previous live births accounted for 59.3% of abortions, and women with no previous live births accounted for 40.7%. Women with one or more previous induced abortions accounted for 43.6% of abortions, and women with no previous abortion accounted for 56.3%. Women with three or more previous births accounted for 14.2% of abortions, and women with three or more previous abortions accounted for 8.2% of abortions. Deaths of women associated with complications from abortion for 2015 are being assessed as part of CDC's Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System. In 2014, the most recent year for which data were available, six women were identified to have died as a result of complications from legal induced abortion.
INTERPRETATION: Among the 49 areas that reported data every year during 2006-2015, decreases in the total number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions resulted in historic lows for the period of analysis for all three measures of abortion. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: The data in this report can help program planners and policymakers identify groups of women with the highest rates of abortion. Unintended pregnancy is the major contributor to induced abortion. Increasing access to and use of effective contraception can reduce unintended pregnancies and further reduce the number of abortions performed in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30462632      PMCID: PMC6289084          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6713a1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ        ISSN: 1545-8636


  71 in total

1.  Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  J Trussell; B Vaughan; J Stanford
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

2.  Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

3.  The intendedness of pregnancy: a concept in transition.

Authors:  L V Klerman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

Review 4.  The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  John Santelli; Roger Rochat; Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Kathryn Curtis; Rebecca Cabral; Jennifer S Hirsch; Laura Schieve
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

5.  Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester.

Authors:  Eleanor A Drey; Diana G Foster; Rebecca A Jackson; Susan J Lee; Lilia H Cardenas; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: data on men and women from cycle 6 (2002) of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Gladys M Martinez; Anjani Chandra; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones; William D Mosher
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2006-05

7.  Pregnancy intentions, pregnancy attitudes, and the use of prenatal care in Missouri.

Authors:  M R Sable; D S Wilkinson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

8.  Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Linda A Bartlett; Cynthia J Berg; Holly B Shulman; Suzanne B Zane; Clarice A Green; Sara Whitehead; Hani K Atrash
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000-2001.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Jacqueline E Darroch; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

10.  Early surgical abortion: efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Maureen E Paul; Caroline M Mitchell; Angela J Rogers; Michelle C Fox; Elyse G Lackie
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  12 in total

1.  Elective Termination of Pregnancy in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: Experience From Two Databases.

Authors:  Michael D Lockshin; Marta Guerra; Jane E Salmon
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 10.995

2.  Abortion services in Canada: access and safety.

Authors:  Laura Schummers; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Exploring Medication Abortion Training in an Internal Medicine Primary Care Residency Program.

Authors:  Robyn Winsor; Marji Gold; Zoey Thill
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Border-state abortions increased for Texas residents after House Bill 2.

Authors:  Sarah Raifman; Gracia Sierra; Daniel Grossman; Sarah E Baum; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter; Kari White
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes Following Prenatal Exposure to Dolutegravir.

Authors:  Vani Vannappagari; Claire Thorne
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  Induced Abortion and the Increased Risk of Maternal Mortality.

Authors:  Patrick J Marmion; Ingrid Skop
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-05-12

7.  The Impact of Abortion Underreporting on Pregnancy Data and Related Research.

Authors:  Sheila Desai; Laura D Lindberg; Isaac Maddow-Zimet; Kathryn Kost
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-04-30

8.  Association of Travel Distance to Nearest Abortion Facility With Rates of Abortion.

Authors:  Kirsten M J Thompson; Hugh J W Sturrock; Diana Greene Foster; Ushma D Upadhyay
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01

9.  Comparison of Women from Georgia and Contiguous States Who Obtained Abortions in Georgia, 1994-2016.

Authors:  Rachel Shapiro; Blake Erhardt-Ohren; Roger Rochat
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-03

10.  Estimated Association of Construction Work With Risks of COVID-19 Infection and Hospitalization in Texas.

Authors:  Remy F Pasco; Spencer J Fox; S Claiborne Johnston; Michael Pignone; Lauren Ancel Meyers
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.