Literature DB >> 10224544

Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.

J Trussell1, B Vaughan.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Half of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended. Of these, half occur to women who were practicing contraception in the month they conceived, and others occur when couples stop use because they find their method difficult or inconvenient to use.
METHODS: Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth were used to compute life-table probabilities of contraceptive failure for reversible methods of contraception, discontinuation of use for a method-related reason and resumption of contraceptive use.
RESULTS: Within one year of starting to use a reversible method of contraception, 9% of women experience a contraceptive failure--7% of those using the pill, 9% of those relying on the male condom and 19% of those practicing withdrawal. During a lifetime of use of reversible methods, the typical woman will experience 1.8 contraceptive failures. Overall, 31% of women discontinue use of a reversible contraceptive for a method-related reason within six months of starting use, and 44% do so within 12 months; however, 68% resume use of a method within one month and 76% do so within three months. Multivariate analyses show that the risk of contraceptive failure is elevated among low-income women and Hispanic women. Low-income women are also less likely than other women to resume contraceptive use after discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS: The risks of pregnancy during typical use of reversible methods of contraception are considerably higher than risks of failure during clinical trials, reflecting imperfect use of these methods rather than lack of inherent efficacy. High rates of method-related discontinuation probably reflect dissatisfaction with available methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptors--women; Americas; Biology; Contraception; Contraception Continuation--women; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Usage; Demographic Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Family Planning Surveys--women; Fertility; Life Table Method; North America; Northern America; Population; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy, Unplanned; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Research Report; Risk Factors--women; United States; Women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10224544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  57 in total

1.  Perceptions of hormonal contraceptive safety and side effects among low-income Latina and non-Latina women.

Authors:  S Guendelman; C Denny; J Mauldon; C Chetkovich
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-12

2.  Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Determinants of contraceptive availability at medical facilities in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Cope; Elizabeth M Yano; Martin L Lee; Donna L Washington
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Preconception markers of dual risk for alcohol and smoking exposed pregnancy: tools for primary prevention.

Authors:  Karen S Ingersoll; Jennifer E Hettema; Karen L Cropsey; Justin P Jackson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Predictors of contraceptive switching and discontinuation within the first 6 months of use among Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake study participants.

Authors:  Rebecca G Simmons; Jessica N Sanders; Claudia Geist; Lori Gawron; Kyl Myers; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The multistate life table method: an application to contraceptive switching behavior.

Authors:  Tzy-Mey Kuo; C M Suchindran; Helen P Koo
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2008-02

7.  Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; David L Eisenberg; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Documentation of contraception and pregnancy when prescribing potentially teratogenic medications for reproductive-age women.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Debbie A Postlethwaite; Yun-Yi Hung; Mary Anne Armstrong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Black-White Differences in Sex and Contraceptive Use Among Young Women.

Authors:  Yasamin Kusunoki; Jennifer S Barber; Elizabeth J Ela; Amelia Bucek
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-10

Review 10.  Contraception for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Rachel Hess; James Trussell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.