Literature DB >> 8521711

IUD use and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

X Xiong1, P Buekens, E Wollast.   

Abstract

Because of inconsistent findings among case-control studies on the relationship between IUD use and the risk of ectopic pregnancy, a meta-analysis of published literature was conducted. From 1977 through 1994, 19 publications regarding 16 studies of ectopic pregnancy and IUD use were found by MEDLINE and manual search. The odds ratio (ORs) of ectopic pregnancy with current and past IUD use in each study were pooled. A quality score system was developed to assess each study. Funnel plot was used to assess potential publication biases. For current IUD use, when cases were compared to pregnant controls, there was an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy (pooled OR: 10.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.66-14.74); when cases were compared to non-pregnant controls, there was no risk of ectopic pregnancy (pooled OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91-1.24). Past IUD use could mildly increase the risk of ectopic pregnancy (pooled OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23-1.59). Selecting pregnant or non-pregnant women as controls, however, did not affect the OR estimates of past IUD use. Current IUD use does not increase the risk of the ectopic pregnancy. However, a pregnancy with an IUD in situ is more often an ectopic one than a pregnancy with no IUD. Past IUD use could mildly elevate the risk of ectopic pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8521711     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00120-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

Review 1.  Ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  J I Tay; J Moore; J J Walker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-01

Review 2.  Ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  J I Tay; J Moore; J J Walker
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-08

3.  Demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive risk factors for ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Audrey J Gaskins; Stacey A Missmer; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Paige L Williams; Irene Souter; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Adverse Effects of Levonorgestrel Emergency Oral Contraceptive.

Authors:  Nattawut Leelakanok; Janthima Methaneethorn
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Screening for chlamydial infections and the risk of ectopic pregnancy in a county in Sweden: ecological analysis.

Authors:  M Egger; N Low; G D Smith; B Lindblom; B Herrmann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

Review 6.  [Histopathology and clinical aspects of extrauterine pregnancy].

Authors:  L-C Horn; S Opitz; R Handzel; C E Brambs
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 7.  Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

Authors:  Caitlin Parks; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The effect of patient gynecologic history on clinician contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Rachel Ruskin; Philip Darney; Eric Vittinghoff; Kevin Grumbach; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  The Moral Nature and Practice of Natural Family Planning versus Contraception.

Authors:  Brian Mullady; Lester Ruppersberger
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2013-08-01

10.  Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event.

Authors:  Fiona C Warren; Keith R Abrams; Su Golder; Alex J Sutton
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.