Literature DB >> 31679950

Intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and unintended pregnancy in women with disabilities.

Jeanne L Alhusen1, Tina Bloom2, Jacqueline Anderson3, Rosemary B Hughes4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with disabilities experience higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) than the general population. Reproductive coercion, a type of intimate partner violence, is associated with an increased risk of unintended pregnancy (UIP), yet little is known about this relationship among women with disabilities.
OBJECTIVE: This qualitative descriptive study explored perspectives of women with disabilities who had experienced an UIP as a result of reproductive coercion.
METHOD: In-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with nine women living with diverse disabilities across the United States as part of a larger study examining facilitators and barriers to UIP among women with disabilities.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed three broad themes related to the ways in which physical violence and reproductive coercion elevated women's risk of UIP. They included (1) inadequate health care provider or system response, (2) disability-related risks for IPV, and (3) resource needs to optimize safety.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first in-depth exploration of ways in which reproductive coercion may lead to an increased risk of UIP among women with disabilities. Health care providers must screen for IPV and reproductive coercion and provide the necessary supports and resources for women with disabilities experiencing unintended pregnancy as a result of violence.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disability; Intimate partner violence; Reproductive coercion; Unintended pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31679950      PMCID: PMC7096251          DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Health J        ISSN: 1876-7583            Impact factor:   2.554


  47 in total

1.  Fertility Desires and Intentions Among U.S. Women by Disability Status: Findings from the 2011-2013 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Tina L Bloom; William Mosher; Jeanne Alhusen; Hannah Lantos; Rosemary B Hughes
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-08

2.  Marijuana use during and after pregnancy and association of prenatal use on birth outcomes: A population-based study.

Authors:  Jean Y Ko; Van T Tong; Jennifer M Bombard; Donald K Hayes; John Davy; Katherine A Perham-Hester
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities.

Authors:  Caroline Signore; Catherine Y Spong; Danuta Krotoski; Nancy L Shinowara; Sean C Blackwell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Efficacy of a computerized abuse and safety assessment intervention for women with disabilities: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Susan Robinson-Whelen; Rosemary B Hughes; Laurie E Powers; Mary Oschwald; Paula Renker; Paul R Swank; Mary Ann Curry
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2010-05

5.  Pregnancy outcomes among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Monika Mitra; Susan L Parish; Karen M Clements; Xiaohui Cui; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Formal and informal help-seeking associated with women's and men's experiences of intimate partner violence in Canada.

Authors:  Donna L Ansara; Michelle J Hindin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  National study of physical and sexual assault among women with disabilities.

Authors:  C Casteel; S L Martin; J B Smith; K K Gurka; L L Kupper
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between unintended pregnancy and perinatal depression.

Authors:  Amanuel Alemu Abajobir; Joemer Calderon Maravilla; Rosa Alati; Jackob Moses Najman
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Racial Differences in Pregnancy Intention, Reproductive Coercion, and Partner Violence among Family Planning Clients: A Qualitative Exploration.

Authors:  Charvonne N Holliday; Elizabeth Miller; Michele R Decker; Jessica G Burke; Patricia I Documet; Sonya B Borrero; Jay G Silverman; Daniel J Tancredi; Edmund Ricci; Heather L McCauley
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2018-04-07

10.  Pregnancy Intention and Pregnancy Outcome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hall; Lorna Benton; Andrew Copas; Judith Stephenson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  Reproductive coercion in college health clinic patients: Risk factors, care seeking and perpetration.

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Michele R Decker; Charvonne N Holliday; Janine Talis; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.057

2.  Perceptions of barriers to effective family planning services among women with disabilities.

Authors:  Jeanne L Alhusen; Tina Bloom; Kathryn Laughon; Lillian Behan; Rosemary B Hughes
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Sexual and Reproductive Health and Reproductive Coercion in Women Victim/Survivors Receiving Housing Support.

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Charvonne N Holliday; Kristin Bevilacqua; Arshdeep Kaur; Janice Miller; Michele R Decker
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2022-03-08

4.  Women's perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Jessica E Moulton; Martha Isela Vazquez Corona; Cathy Vaughan; Meghan A Bohren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.