Literature DB >> 31846612

Coverage of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception has improved birth intervals for at-risk populations.

Abigail Liberty1, Kimberly Yee2, Blair G Darney1, Ana Lopez-Defede3, Maria I Rodriguez4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2012, South Carolina revised the Medicaid policy to cover reimbursement for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception may improve health outcomes for populations at risk with a subsequent short-interval pregnancy.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the impact of the Medicaid policy change on the initiation of long-acting and reversible contraception (immediate postpartum and postpartum) within key populations. We determined whether immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception use varied by adequate prenatal care (>7 visits), metropolitan location, and medical comorbidities. We also tested the association of immediate postpartum and postpartum long-acting, reversible contraception on interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a historical cohort study of live births among Medicaid recipients in South Carolina between 2010 and 2017, 2 years before and 5 years after the policy change. We used birth certificate data linked with Medicaid claims. Our primary outcome was immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception, and our secondary outcome was short interpregnancy interval. We characterize trends in long-acting and reversible contraception use and interpregnancy interval over the study period. We used logistic regression models to test the association of key factors (rural, inadequate prenatal care, and medical comorbidities) with immediate and outpatient postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception following the policy change and to test the association of immediate postpartum and postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception with short interpregnancy interval.
RESULTS: Our sample included 187,438 births to 145,973 women. Overall, 44.7% of the sample was white, with a mean age of 25.0 years. A majority of the sample (61.5%) was multiparous and resided in metropolitan areas (79.5%). The odds of receipt of immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception use increased after the policy change (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39, 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.43). Women with inadequate prenatal care (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50, 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.71) and medically complex pregnancies had higher odds of receipt of immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception following the policy change (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47, 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.67) compared with women with adequate prenatal care and normal pregnancies. Women residing in rural areas were less likely to receive immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception (adjusted odds ratio, 0.36, 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.44) than women in metropolitan areas. Utilization of immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception was associated with a decreased odds of a subsequent short interpregnancy interval (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62, 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.89).
CONCLUSION: Women at risk of a subsequent pregnancy and complications (inadequate prenatal care and medical comorbidities) are more likely to receive immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception following the policy change. Efforts are needed to improve access in rural areas.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid policy; immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception; implant; intrauterine device; short interpregnancy intervals

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31846612      PMCID: PMC7147501          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  26 in total

1.  Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Irene Woo; Sara Seifert; Dacia Hendricks; Roxanne M Jamshidi; Anne E Burke; Michelle C Fox
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost.

Authors:  Maria I Rodriguez; Megan Evans; Eve Espey
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Patients' experiences with South Carolina's immediate postpartum Long-acting reversible contraception Medicaid policy.

Authors:  Emily S Mann; Ashley L White; Peyton L Rogers; Anu Manchikanti Gomez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Association between injectable progestin-only contraceptives and HIV acquisition and HIV target cell frequency in the female genital tract in South African women: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Byrne; Melis N Anahtar; Kathleen E Cohen; Amber Moodley; Nikita Padavattan; Nasreen Ismail; Brittany A Bowman; Gregory S Olson; Amanda Mabhula; Alasdair Leslie; Thumbi Ndung'u; Bruce D Walker; Musie S Ghebremichael; Krista L Dong; Douglas S Kwon
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Policy change is not enough: engaging provider champions on immediate postpartum contraception.

Authors:  Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Debra J Kane; Rebekah E Gee; Lyn Kieltyka; Brittni N Frederiksen; Katharyn M Baca; Kristin M Rankin; David A Goodman; Charlan D Kroelinger; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States.

Authors:  Alison Gemmill; Laura Duberstein Lindberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  The influence of interpregnancy interval on infant mortality.

Authors:  David McKinney; Melissa House; Aimin Chen; Louis Muglia; Emily DeFranco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Brooke A Kinniburgh; Lily Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Short Interpregnancy Intervals: Results from the First Baby Study.

Authors:  Lisa M Masinter; Blair Dina; Kristen Kjerulff; Joe Feinglass
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-04-11

10.  Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  3 in total

1.  Postpartum contraception method type and risk of a short interpregnancy interval in a state Medicaid population.

Authors:  Katie Gifford; Mary Joan McDuffie; Hira Rashid; Erin K Knight; Rebecca McColl; Michel Boudreaux; Michael S Rendall
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Medicaid Payments For Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Evidence From South Carolina.

Authors:  Maria W Steenland; Lydia E Pace; Anna D Sinaiko; Jessica L Cohen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 9.048

3.  Postpartum Treatment for Substance Use Disorder Among Mothers of Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome and Prenatal Substance Exposure.

Authors:  Laura J Faherty; Sara Heins; Ashley M Kranz; Bradley D Stein
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-06-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.