Literature DB >> 26860291

Was it worth it? Patients' perspectives on the perceived value of genomic-based individualized medicine.

Colin Me Halverson1,2, Kristin E Clift1,3, Jennifer B McCormick4,5,6.   

Abstract

The value of genomic sequencing is often understood in terms of its ability to affect diagnosis or treatment. In these terms, successes occur only in a minority of cases. This paper presents views from patients who had exome sequencing done clinically to explore how they perceive the utility of genomic medicine. The authors used semi-structured, qualitative interviews in order to study patients' attitudes toward genomic sequencing in oncology and rare-disease settings. Participants from 37 cases were interviewed. In terms of the testing's key values-regardless of having received what clinicians described as meaningful results-participants expressed four qualities that are separate from traditional views of clinical utility: Participants felt they had been empowered over their own health. They felt they had contributed altruistically to the progress of genomic technology in medicine. They felt their suffering had been legitimated. They also felt a sense of closure, having done everything they could. Patients expressed overwhelmingly positive attitudes toward sequencing. Their rationale was not solely based on the results' clinical utility. It is important for clinicians to understand this non-medical reasoning as it pertains to patient decision-making and informed consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical utility; Genomic sequencing; Patient views; Precision medicine

Year:  2016        PMID: 26860291      PMCID: PMC4796045          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-016-0260-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  41 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Lisa Kalman; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; Robert C Green
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Personalized medicine and genomics: challenges and opportunities in assessing effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and future research priorities.

Authors:  Rena Conti; David L Veenstra; Katrina Armstrong; Lawrence J Lesko; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Outcomes of interest in evidence-based evaluations of genetic tests.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Steven M Teutsch; Celia I Kaye; Maxine Hayes; James E Haddow; Linda A Bradley; Kathleen Szegda; W David Dotson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Preserving personal autonomy in a genomic testing era.

Authors:  Noralane M Lindor; Kiley J Johnson; Jennifer B McCormick; Eric W Klee; Matthew J Ferber; Gianrico Farrugia
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Factors influencing success of clinical genome sequencing across a broad spectrum of disorders.

Authors:  Jenny C Taylor; Hilary C Martin; Stefano Lise; John Broxholme; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Andy Rimmer; Alexander Kanapin; Gerton Lunter; Simon Fiddy; Chris Allan; A Radu Aricescu; Moustafa Attar; Christian Babbs; Jennifer Becq; David Beeson; Celeste Bento; Patricia Bignell; Edward Blair; Veronica J Buckle; Katherine Bull; Ondrej Cais; Holger Cario; Helen Chapel; Richard R Copley; Richard Cornall; Jude Craft; Karin Dahan; Emma E Davenport; Calliope Dendrou; Olivier Devuyst; Aimée L Fenwick; Jonathan Flint; Lars Fugger; Rodney D Gilbert; Anne Goriely; Angie Green; Ingo H Greger; Russell Grocock; Anja V Gruszczyk; Robert Hastings; Edouard Hatton; Doug Higgs; Adrian Hill; Chris Holmes; Malcolm Howard; Linda Hughes; Peter Humburg; David Johnson; Fredrik Karpe; Zoya Kingsbury; Usha Kini; Julian C Knight; Jonathan Krohn; Sarah Lamble; Craig Langman; Lorne Lonie; Joshua Luck; Davis McCarthy; Simon J McGowan; Mary Frances McMullin; Kerry A Miller; Lisa Murray; Andrea H Németh; M Andrew Nesbit; David Nutt; Elizabeth Ormondroyd; Annette Bang Oturai; Alistair Pagnamenta; Smita Y Patel; Melanie Percy; Nayia Petousi; Paolo Piazza; Sian E Piret; Guadalupe Polanco-Echeverry; Niko Popitsch; Fiona Powrie; Chris Pugh; Lynn Quek; Peter A Robbins; Kathryn Robson; Alexandra Russo; Natasha Sahgal; Pauline A van Schouwenburg; Anna Schuh; Earl Silverman; Alison Simmons; Per Soelberg Sørensen; Elizabeth Sweeney; John Taylor; Rajesh V Thakker; Ian Tomlinson; Amy Trebes; Stephen Rf Twigg; Holm H Uhlig; Paresh Vyas; Tim Vyse; Steven A Wall; Hugh Watkins; Michael P Whyte; Lorna Witty; Ben Wright; Chris Yau; David Buck; Sean Humphray; Peter J Ratcliffe; John I Bell; Andrew Om Wilkie; David Bentley; Peter Donnelly; Gilean McVean
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  How can the evaluation of genetic tests be enhanced? Lessons learned from the ACCE framework and evaluating genetic tests in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Simon Sanderson; Ron Zimmern; Mark Kroese; Julian Higgins; Christine Patch; Jon Emery
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  What is the clinical utility of genetic testing?

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  14 in total

1.  Defining personal utility in genomics: A Delphi study.

Authors:  J N Kohler; E Turbitt; K L Lewis; B S Wilfond; L Jamal; H L Peay; L G Biesecker; B B Biesecker
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Using the diffusion of innovations model to guide participant engagement in the genomics era.

Authors:  Katie L Lewis; Flavia M Facio; Courtney D Berrios
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Patient and public understanding of the concept of 'personalised medicine' in relation to cancer treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jed Botham; Valerie Shilling; John Jones
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-11

4.  Implementation matters: How patient experiences differ when genetic counseling accompanies the return of genetic variants of uncertain significance.

Authors:  Harsh V Patel; Nora B Henrikson; James D Ralston; Kathleen Leppig; Aaron Scrol; Gail P Jarvik; Shannon DeVange; Eric B Larson; Andrea L Hartzler
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  Parental motivations for and adaptation to trio-exome sequencing in a prospective prenatal testing cohort: Beyond the diagnosis.

Authors:  Asha N Talati; Kelly L Gilmore; Emily E Hardisty; Anne D Lyerly; Christine Rini; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.242

6.  Patients' Expectations of Benefits From Large-Panel Genomic Tumor Testing in Rural Community Oncology Practices.

Authors:  Eric C Anderson; John DiPalazzo; Emily Edelman; Petra Helbig; Kate Reed; Susan Miesfeldt; Christian Thomas; F Lee Lucas; Anny T H R Fenton; Andrey Antov; Michael J Hall; J Scott Roberts; Jens Rueter; Paul K J Han
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-09-29

7.  Understanding What Information Is Valued By Research Participants, And Why.

Authors:  Consuelo H Wilkins; Brandy M Mapes; Rebecca N Jerome; Victoria Villalta-Gil; Jill M Pulley; Paul A Harris
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Integrating precision cancer medicine into healthcare-policy, practice, and research challenges.

Authors:  Gabrielle Bertier; Jian Carrot-Zhang; Vassilis Ragoussis; Yann Joly
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Diagnosis of rare diseases under focus: impacts for Canadian patients.

Authors:  Daphne Esquivel-Sada; Minh Thu Nguyen
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-07-21

10.  Parental Perspectives on Whole Exome Sequencing in Pediatric Cancer: A Typology of Perceived Utility.

Authors:  Janet Malek; Melody J Slashinski; Jill O Robinson; Amanda M Gutierrez; D Williams Parsons; Sharon E Plon; Laurence B McCullough; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.