Literature DB >> 35132674

Parental motivations for and adaptation to trio-exome sequencing in a prospective prenatal testing cohort: Beyond the diagnosis.

Asha N Talati1, Kelly L Gilmore1, Emily E Hardisty1, Anne D Lyerly2, Christine Rini3, Neeta L Vora1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand motivations for and parental interpretation of results from trio-exome sequencing (ES) for fetal anomalies with a negative standard genetic diagnosis.
METHODS: Analysis of an ongoing, prospective prenatal trio-ES study of pregnancies with ultrasound-identified congenital anomalies and lack of a standard genetic diagnosis. After determination of pregnancy disposition, participants completed questionnaires and a semi-structured interview pre- and post-sequencing. Interviews were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory methodology to identify themes. Associations between themes and ES result were also examined.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six trios have been sequenced. Of those, 45 (36%) resulted in fetal diagnosis. One hundred twenty-five women completed pre-sequencing surveys, and 91 women completed post-sequencing surveys. The main themes identified include (1) variable reasons to pursue ES, (2) limited expectations but high hopes from ES, (3) parental adaptation to uncertain results, (4) impact on personal health and reproduction, and (5) gratitude for the process.
CONCLUSION: Participants pursued ES for various reasons, most often to identify a diagnosis and guide reproduction. Post-sequencing, most participants described the process, their interpretation of results, and the impact of receiving the results. Less frequently, but of most concern, participants expressed anxiety about testing and implications for themselves, relationships, and other family members, thus identifying an area of high need for additional support among patients undergoing prenatal ES.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35132674      PMCID: PMC9175118          DOI: 10.1002/pd.6112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.242


  26 in total

1.  Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Slavé Petrovski; Vimla Aggarwal; Jessica L Giordano; Melissa Stosic; Karen Wou; Louise Bier; Erica Spiegel; Kelly Brennan; Nicholas Stong; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Zhong Ren; Xiaolin Zhu; Caroline Mebane; Odelia Nahum; Quanli Wang; Sitharthan Kamalakaran; Colin Malone; Kwame Anyane-Yeboa; Russell Miller; Brynn Levy; David B Goldstein; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Joint Position Statement from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD), the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the Perinatal Quality Foundation (PQF) on the use of genome-wide sequencing for fetal diagnosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Expert Knowledge Influences Decision-Making for Couples Receiving Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing Results.

Authors:  M A Rubel; A Werner-Lin; F K Barg; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09

4.  Parental perceptions of prenatal whole exome sequencing (PPPWES) study.

Authors:  Karen Wou; Talia Weitz; Clare McCormack; Julia Wynn; Erica Spiegel; Jessica Giordano; Ronald J Wapner; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 5.  Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Sunayna Best; Karen Wou; Neeta Vora; Ignatia B Van der Veyver; Ronald Wapner; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study.

Authors:  Jenny Lord; Dominic J McMullan; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Gabriele Rinck; Susan J Hamilton; Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones; Elena Prigmore; Rebecca Keelagher; Sunayna K Best; Georgina K Carey; Rhiannon Mellis; Sarah Robart; Ian R Berry; Kate E Chandler; Deirdre Cilliers; Lara Cresswell; Sandra L Edwards; Carol Gardiner; Alex Henderson; Simon T Holden; Tessa Homfray; Tracy Lester; Rebecca A Lewis; Ruth Newbury-Ecob; Katrina Prescott; Oliver W Quarrell; Simon C Ramsden; Eileen Roberts; Dagmar Tapon; Madeleine J Tooley; Pradeep C Vasudevan; Astrid P Weber; Diana G Wellesley; Paul Westwood; Helen White; Michael Parker; Denise Williams; Lucy Jenkins; Richard H Scott; Mark D Kilby; Lyn S Chitty; Matthew E Hurles; Eamonn R Maher
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 202.731

7.  An approach to integrating exome sequencing for fetal structural anomalies into clinical practice.

Authors:  Neeta L Vora; Kelly Gilmore; Alicia Brandt; Chelsea Gustafson; Natasha Strande; Lori Ramkissoon; Emily Hardisty; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Kirk Wilhelmsen; Phillips Owen; Karen E Weck; Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell; Bradford C Powell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Next-generation sequencing and prenatal 'omics: advanced diagnostics and new insights into human development.

Authors:  Neeta L Vora; Lisa Hui
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-07-22       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Counseling Challenges with Variants of Uncertain Significance and Incidental Findings in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lauren Westerfield; Sandra Darilek; Ignatia B van den Veyver
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Danielle Soucier; Karen Hanson; Melissa S Savage; Laird Jackson; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Implementation of Exome Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnosis and Impact on Genetic Counseling: The Polish Experience.

Authors:  Anna Kucińska-Chahwan; Maciej Geremek; Tomasz Roszkowski; Julia Bijok; Diana Massalska; Michał Ciebiera; Hildeberto Correia; Iris Pereira-Caetano; Ana Barreta; Ewa Obersztyn; Anna Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak; Paweł Własienko; Małgorzata Krajewska-Walasek; Piotr Węgrzyn; Lech Dudarewicz; Waldemar Krzeszowski; Magda Rybak-Krzyszkowska; Beata Nowakowska
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  Implementing a rapid fetal exome sequencing service: What do parents and health professionals think?

Authors:  Rhiannon Mellis; Dagmar Tapon; Nora Shannon; Esther Dempsey; Pranav Pandya; Lyn S Chitty; Melissa Hill
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.242

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.