Literature DB >> 20824443

Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases.

Scott D Grosse1, Lisa Kalman, Muin J Khoury.   

Abstract

The conventional criteria for evaluating genetic tests include analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility. Analytical validity refers to a test's ability to measure the genotype of interest accurately and reliably. Clinical validity refers to a test's ability to detect or predict the clinical disorder or phenotype associated with the genotype. Clinical utility of a test is a measure of its usefulness in the clinic and resulting changes in clinical endpoints. In addition, the utility to individuals and families of genomic information, or personal utility, should be considered. This chapter identifies methodological and data issues involved in assessing each type of validity or utility. The validity and utility of a test must be considered in a specific context, which include diagnostic testing, newborn screening, prenatal carrier screening, and family or cascade screening. Specific rare disorders addressed include cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, Huntington disease, as well as cancer associated with BRCA mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20824443     DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  21 in total

1.  Points to consider in assessing and appraising predictive genetic tests.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Jürgen John; Helena Kääriäinen; Alastair Kent; Ulf Kristofferson; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-16

Review 2.  International differences in the evaluation of conditions for newborn bloodspot screening: a review of scientific literature and policy documents.

Authors:  Marleen E Jansen; Selina C Metternick-Jones; Karla J Lister
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The challenge of implementing genetic tests with clinical utility while avoiding unsound applications.

Authors:  Martina C Cornel; Carla G van El; Pascal Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-10-09

4.  Characterizing genetic variants for clinical action.

Authors:  Erin M Ramos; Corina Din-Lovinescu; Jonathan S Berg; Lisa D Brooks; Audrey Duncanson; Michael Dunn; Peter Good; Tim J P Hubbard; Gail P Jarvik; Christopher O'Donnell; Stephen T Sherry; Naomi Aronson; Leslie G Biesecker; Bruce Blumberg; Ned Calonge; Helen M Colhoun; Robert S Epstein; Paul Flicek; Erynn S Gordon; Eric D Green; Robert C Green; Matthew Hurles; Kensaku Kawamoto; William Knaus; David H Ledbetter; Howard P Levy; Elaine Lyon; Donna Maglott; Howard L McLeod; Nazneen Rahman; Gurvaneet Randhawa; Catherine Wicklund; Teri A Manolio; Rex L Chisholm; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.908

5.  Genetics and treatment options for recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Celeste A Shelton; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09

6.  Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research.

Authors:  Ingrid A Holm; Brittany R Iles; Sonja I Ziniel; Phoebe L Bacon; Sarah K Savage; Kurt D Christensen; Elissa R Weitzman; Robert C Green; Noelle L Huntington
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 7.  Living laboratory: whole-genome sequencing as a learning healthcare enterprise.

Authors:  M Angrist; L Jamal
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.

Authors:  Elvira D'Andrea; Tyra Lagerberg; Corrado De Vito; Erica Pitini; Carolina Marzuillo; Azzurra Massimi; Maria Rosaria Vacchio; Paola Grammatico; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Parents' Experience with Pediatric Microarray: Transferrable Lessons in the Era of Genomic Counseling.

Authors:  R Z Hayeems; R Babul-Hirji; N Hoang; R Weksberg; C Shuman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics.

Authors:  Sara Huston Katsanis; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.