Literature DB >> 35309003

Implementation matters: How patient experiences differ when genetic counseling accompanies the return of genetic variants of uncertain significance.

Harsh V Patel1, Nora B Henrikson2, James D Ralston2, Kathleen Leppig1, Aaron Scrol2, Gail P Jarvik1, Shannon DeVange1, Eric B Larson2, Andrea L Hartzler1.   

Abstract

Precision medicine presents challenges for effective return of results (ROR) to patients, particularly for variants of uncertain significance (VUS) where the need for genetic counseling and the impact of results are underexplored. We investigated patients' experiences with VUS ROR. Through interviews we compared experiences of patients who were referred to genetic counseling with those not referred. Although participants from both groups (n=16) reported curious enthusiasm and relief after ROR, the 5 referred participants reported less confusion, less disappointment, and better confidence in understanding their results than the 11 non-referred participants. Although VUS did not impact healthcare or daily lives, some participants who shared VUS fostered communication about future healthcare. Suggested ROR improvements included patient-friendly terminology, on-demand education, and ongoing consultation. Although patient experience of VUS improved when ROR involved expert consultation, scarcity of genetic counselors presents challenges. Improving the ROR process with patient-centered solutions could enhance the patient experience of receiving VUS. ©2021 AMIA - All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35309003      PMCID: PMC8861684     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  18 in total

1.  Harmonizing Clinical Sequencing and Interpretation for the eMERGE III Network.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Laurie E Steffen; Barbara H Brumbach; Wendy Kohlmann; Ruofei Du; Ji-Hyun Lee; Amanda Gammon; Karin Butler; Saundra S Buys; Antoinette M Stroup; Rebecca A Campo; Kristina G Flores; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Patients' perspectives of variants of uncertain significance and strategies for uncertainty management.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Brian H Shirts; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Lynch Syndrome Limbo: Patient Understanding of Variants of Uncertain Significance.

Authors:  Ilana Solomon; Elizabeth Harrington; Gillian Hooker; Lori Erby; Jennifer Axilbund; Heather Hampel; Kara Semotiuk; Amie Blanco; William M P Klein; Francis Giardiello; Lori Leonard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Patients' views on variants of uncertain significance across indications.

Authors:  Kristin Clift; Sarah Macklin; Colin Halverson; Jennifer B McCormick; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Stephanie Hines
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-08-20

6.  Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports.

Authors:  Orit Shaer; Oded Nov; Johanna Okerlund; Martina Balestra; Elizabeth Stowell; Laura Ascher; Joanna Bi; Claire Schlenker; Madeleine Ball
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Kathryn I Pollak; Catherine Rehder; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer H Crow; Michael Datto
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  My46: a Web-based tool for self-guided management of genomic test results in research and clinical settings.

Authors:  Holly K Tabor; Seema M Jamal; Joon-Ho Yu; Julia M Crouch; Aditi G Shankar; Karin M Dent; Nick Anderson; Damon A Miller; Brett T Futral; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Impact of a Patient-Facing Enhanced Genomic Results Report to Improve Understanding, Engagement, and Communication.

Authors:  Janet L Williams; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Doris T Zallen; Heather Stuckey; Kara Fultz; Audrey L Fan; Michele Bonhag; Lynn Feldman; Michael M Segal; Marc S Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.