Literature DB >> 20086232

Personalized medicine and genomics: challenges and opportunities in assessing effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and future research priorities.

Rena Conti1, David L Veenstra, Katrina Armstrong, Lawrence J Lesko, Scott D Grosse.   

Abstract

Personalized medicine is health care that tailors interventions to individual variation in risk and treatment response. Although medicine has long strived to achieve this goal, advances in genomics promise to facilitate this process. Relevant to present-day practice is the use of genomic information to classify individuals according to disease susceptibility or expected responsiveness to a pharmacologic treatment and to provide targeted interventions. A symposium at the annual meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making on 23 October 2007 highlighted the challenges and opportunities posed in translating advances in molecular medicine into clinical practice. A panel of US experts in medical practice, regulatory policy, technology assessment, and the financing and organization of medical innovation was asked to discuss the current state of practice and research on personalized medicine as it relates to their own field. This article reports on the issues raised, discusses potential approaches to meet these challenges, and proposes directions for future work. The case of genetic testing to inform dosing with warfarin, an anticoagulant, is used to illustrate differing perspectives on evidence and decision making for personalized medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20086232      PMCID: PMC4598076          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09347014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  54 in total

1.  Value of information on preference heterogeneity and individualized care.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; David Meltzer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Coverage with evidence development: an examination of conceptual and policy issues.

Authors:  John Hutton; Paul Trueman; Christopher Henshall
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  Ancillary risk information and pharmacogenetic tests: social and policy implications.

Authors:  N B Henrikson; W Burke; D L Veenstra
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  Skipping toward personalized molecular medicine.

Authors:  Eric P Hoffman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  The critical path of warfarin dosing: finding an optimal dosing strategy using pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  L J Lesko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Coverage with evidence development: ethical issues and policy implications.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events.

Authors:  Daniel S Budnitz; Daniel A Pollock; Kelly N Weidenbach; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Thomas J Schroeder; Joseph L Annest
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Categorizing genetic tests to identify their ethical, legal, and social implications.

Authors:  W Burke; L E Pinsky; N A Press
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

10.  Prioritizing future research on off-label prescribing: results of a quantitative evaluation.

Authors:  Surrey M Walton; Glen T Schumock; Ky-Van Lee; G Caleb Alexander; David Meltzer; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.705

View more
  33 in total

1.  Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: a new approach based on risk prediction.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Parents' attitudes toward pediatric genetic testing for common disease risk.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Sharon Hensley Alford; Karen M Emmons; Isaac M Lipkus; Benjamin S Wilfond; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Health technology assessment and private payers' coverage of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Julia R Trosman; Stephanie L Van Bebber; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  The Routine Clinical use of Pharmacogenetic Tests: What it Will Require?

Authors:  Mafalda M Dias; Michael J Sorich; Andrew Rowland; Michael D Wiese; Ross A McKinnon
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Personalised medicine: a critique on the future of health care.

Authors:  Jacqueline Savard
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Mark Helfand; Sean Tunis; Evelyn P Whitlock; Stephen G Pauker; Anirban Basu; Jon Chilingerian; Frank E Harrell; David O Meltzer; Victor M Montori; Donald S Shepard; David M Kent
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 7.  Dashboard systems: implementing pharmacometrics from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Diane R Mould; Richard N Upton; Jessica Wojciechowski
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Landscape of next-generation sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Thomas P Niedringhaus; Denitsa Milanova; Matthew B Kerby; Michael P Snyder; Annelise E Barron
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Characteristics associated with informed consent for genetic studies in the ACCORD trial.

Authors:  Denise G Simons-Morton; Jeffrey C Chan; Angela R Kimel; Peter E Linz; Cynthia L Stowe; John Summerson; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Differences in Weight Loss Between Persons on Standard Balanced vs Nutrigenetic Diets in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Karen A Frankwich; Jeremy Egnatios; Mandy L Kenyon; Thomas R Rutledge; Patricia S Liao; Samir Gupta; Karen L Herbst; Amir Zarrinpar
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.