Literature DB >> 26854320

Comparison of the biometric formulas used for applanation A-scan ultrasound biometry.

Fatih Özcura1, Serdar Aktaş2, Hacı Murat Sağdık2, Mehmet Tetikoğlu2.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the accuracy of various biometric formulas for predicting postoperative refraction determined using applanation A-scan ultrasound. This retrospective comparative study included 485 eyes that underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Applanation A-scan ultrasound biometry and postoperative manifest refraction were obtained in all eyes. Biometric data were entered into each of the five IOL power calculation formulas: SRK-II, SRK/T, Holladay I, Hoffer Q, and Binkhorst II. All eyes were divided into three groups according to axial length: short (≤22.0 mm), average (22.0-25.0 mm), and long (≥25.0 mm) eyes. The postoperative spherical equivalent was calculated and compared with the predicted refractive error using each biometric formula. The results showed that all formulas had significantly lower mean absolute error (MAE) in comparison with Binkhorst II formula (P < 0.01). The lowest MAE was obtained with the SRK-II for average (0.49 ± 0.40 D) and short (0.67 ± 0.54 D) eyes and the SRK/T for long (0.61 ± 0.50 D) eyes. The highest postoperative hyperopic shift was seen with the SRK-II for average (46.8 %), short (28.1 %), and long (48.4 %) eyes. The highest postoperative myopic shift was seen with the Holladay I for average (66.4 %) and long (71.0 %) eyes and the SRK/T for short eyes (80.6 %). In conclusion, the SRK-II formula produced the lowest MAE in average and short eyes and the SRK/T formula produced the lowest MAE in long eyes. The SRK-II has the highest postoperative hyperopic shift in all eyes. The highest postoperative myopic shift is with the Holladay I for average and long eyes and SRK/T for short eyes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A-scan; Biometry; Cataract

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26854320     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0195-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  9 in total

1.  Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry.

Authors:  Petros Aristodemou; Nathaniel E Knox Cartwright; John M Sparrow; Robert L Johnston
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas.

Authors:  Julio Narváez; Grenith Zimmerman; R Doyle Stulting; Daniel H Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations.

Authors:  J T Holladay; T C Prager; T Y Chandler; K H Musgrove; J W Lewis; R S Ruiz
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula.

Authors:  J A Retzlaff; D R Sanders; M C Kraff
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Comparison of the SRK/T formula and other theoretical and regression formulas.

Authors:  D R Sanders; J A Retzlaff; M C Kraff; H V Gimbel; M G Raanan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas.

Authors:  K J Hoffer
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 7.  Optimising biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery.

Authors:  R Sheard
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  Clinically relevant biometry.

Authors:  Afsun Sahin; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.

Authors:  M S Rajan; I Keilhorn; J A Bell
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.775

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Tabatabaei; Melika Samadi; Mohammad Soleimani; Hosein Fonoodi; Sepideh Ghods; Bahman Inanloo
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-13

2.  Inter-ocular and inter-visit differences in ocular biometry and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Hyun Sup Choi; Hyo Soon Yoo; Yerim An; Sam Young Yoon; Sung Pyo Park; Yong-Kyu Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.