Literature DB >> 24310239

Optimising biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery.

R Sheard1.   

Abstract

Biometry has become one of the most important steps in modern cataract surgery and, according to the Royal College of Ophthalmologists Cataract Surgery Guidelines, what matters most is achieving excellent results. This paper is aimed at the NHS cataract surgeon and intends to be a critical review of the recent literature on biometry for cataract surgery, summarising the evidence for current best practice standards and available practical strategies for improving outcomes for patients. With modern optical biometry for the majority of patients, informed formula choice and intraocular lens (IOL) constant optimisation outcomes of more than 90% within ± 1 D and more than 60% within ± 0.5 D of target are achievable. There are a number of strategies available to surgeons wishing to exceed these outcomes, the most promising of which are the use of strict-tolerance IOLs and second eye prediction refinement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24310239      PMCID: PMC3930261          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  41 in total

1.  Intra-ocular acrylic lenses; a recent development in the surgery of cataract.

Authors:  H RIDLEY
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1952-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Harold Ridley and the invention of the intraocular lens.

Authors:  D J Apple; J Sims
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Pre- and postoperative refraction after cataract extraction with implantation of standard power IOL.

Authors:  T Olsen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula.

Authors:  J A Retzlaff; D R Sanders; M C Kraff
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation.

Authors:  J Schelenz; J Kammann
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Using the surgical result in the first eye to calculate intraocular lens power for the second eye.

Authors:  T Olsen; N Løgstrup; H Olesen; L Corydon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas.

Authors:  K J Hoffer
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 8.  Preoperative cataract evaluation: intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  K J Hoffer
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1982

9.  Intraocular lens power calculation for emmetropia: a clinical study.

Authors:  J S Hillman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Comparison of the SRK II formula and other second generation formulas.

Authors:  D R Sanders; J Retzlaff; M C Kraff
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  17 in total

1.  Comparison of the biometric formulas used for applanation A-scan ultrasound biometry.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Serdar Aktaş; Hacı Murat Sağdık; Mehmet Tetikoğlu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of postoperative refractive outcome in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy vs cataract surgery following vitrectomy.

Authors:  Paris G Tranos; Bruce Allan; Miltiadis Balidis; Athanasios Vakalis; Solon Asteriades; George Anogeianakis; Magda Triantafilla; Nikolaos Kozeis; Panagiotis Stavrakas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of immersion ultrasound and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients.

Authors:  Yan Li; Hong-Xun Li; Yang-Chen Liu; Ya-Tu Guo; Jian-Min Gao; Bin Wu; Nan Zhang; Dong Liu; Xiao-Yong Yuan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  A Revised Estimate of Costs Associated With Routine Preoperative Testing in Medicare Cataract Patients With a Procedure-Specific Indicator.

Authors:  Catherine L Chen; Theodore H Clay; Stephen McLeod; Han-Ying Peggy Chang; Adrian W Gelb; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 5.  Reviewing the visual benefits of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Can we improve our outcomes?

Authors:  Michael Lawless; Lewis Levitz; Chris Hodge
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Post-operative Refractive Prediction Error After Phacovitrectomy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Gijsbert J Hötte; Daniël P de Bruyn; Joeri de Hoog
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2017-12-13

7.  Preoperative Medical Testing and Falls in Medicare Beneficiaries Awaiting Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Catherine L Chen; Stephen D McLeod; Thomas M Lietman; Hui Shen; W John Boscardin; Han-Ying Peggy Chang; Mary A Whooley; Adrian W Gelb; Sei J Lee; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Myopic Shift after Implantation of a Novel Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Korean Eyes.

Authors:  Sungsoon Hwang; Dong Hui Lim; Joo Hyun; Myoung Joon Kim; Tae Young Chung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-24

9.  Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster).

Authors:  Ahnul Ha; Won Ryang Wee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-15

Review 10.  Update on Intraocular Lens Formulas and Calculations.

Authors:  Tina Xia; Christine E Martinez; Linda M Tsai
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2020 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.