Literature DB >> 26827040

The effect of presentation level on spectral weights for sentences.

Lauren Calandruccio1, Emily Buss2, Karen A Doherty3.   

Abstract

Psychophysical data indicate that spectral weights tend to increase with increasing presentation level at high frequencies. The present study examined whether spectral weights for speech perception are similarly affected by presentation level. Stimuli were sentences filtered into five contiguous frequency bands and presented at each of two levels (75 and 95 dB sound pressure level [SPL]). For the highest band (2807-10,000 Hz), normal-hearing listeners' weights were higher for the higher presentation level. Weights for the 95-dB-SPL level resembled those previously estimated for hearing-impaired listeners tested at comparably high levels, suggesting that hearing loss itself may not play a large role in spectral weighting for a sentence recognition task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26827040      PMCID: PMC4723404          DOI: 10.1121/1.4940211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words.

Authors:  Gerald A Studebaker; Robert L Sherbecoe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.

Authors:  D A Vickers; B C Moore; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual weights in auditory level discrimination.

Authors:  Reinier Kortekaas; Søren Buus; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Christian Füllgrabe; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual weights for loudness judgments of six-tone complexes.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Daniel L Valente; Suyash N Joshi; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spectral weights for sample discrimination as a function of overall level.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Benefits of amplification for speech recognition in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Belinda A Henry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spectral shape discrimination by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Adult hearing-aid users with cochlear dead regions restricted to high frequencies: Implications for amplification.

Authors:  Anna Pepler; Kathryn Lewis; Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.

Authors:  Suzanne Carr Levy; Daniel J Freed; Michael Nilsson; Brian C J Moore; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.

Authors:  Katie M Thrailkill; Marc A Brennan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Chloé Langlet; Christian Lorenzi; Diane S Lazard; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Hearing-Impaired Listeners Show Reduced Attention to High-Frequency Information in the Presence of Low-Frequency Information.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.