Literature DB >> 34717459

Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Elin Roverud1, Judy R Dubno2, Virginia M Richards3, Gerald Kidd1.   

Abstract

Previous studies of level discrimination reported that listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) place greater weight on high frequencies than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. It is not clear whether these results are influenced by stimulus factors (e.g., group differences in presentation levels, cross-frequency discriminability of level differences used to measure weights) and whether such weights generalize to other tasks. Here, NH and SNHL weights were measured for level, duration, and frequency discrimination of two-tone complexes after measuring discriminability just-noticeable differences for each frequency and stimulus dimension. Stimuli were presented at equal sensation level (SL) or equal sound pressure level (SPL). Results showed that weights could change depending on which frequency contained the more discriminable level difference with uncontrolled cross-frequency discriminability. When cross-frequency discriminability was controlled, weights were consistent for level and duration discrimination, but not for frequency discrimination. Comparing equal SL and equal SPL weights indicated greater weight on the higher-level tone for level and duration discrimination. Weights were unrelated to improvements in recognition of low-pass-filtered speech with increasing cutoff frequency. These results suggest that cross-frequency weights and NH and SNHL weighting differences are influenced by stimulus factors and may not generalize to the use of speech cues in specific frequency regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34717459      PMCID: PMC8637742          DOI: 10.1121/10.0006450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  57 in total

1.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  A measure of internal noise based on sample discrimination.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Lance Nizami; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity.

Authors:  B C Moore; R W Peters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task.

Authors:  B G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  T Y Ching; H Dillon; D Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.

Authors:  Katie M Thrailkill; Marc A Brennan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-06

8.  Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Providing low- and mid-frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  C W Turner; S L Brus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.