Literature DB >> 29794566

Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.

Katie M Thrailkill1,2, Marc A Brennan2, Walt Jesteadt1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study is to describe the effect of hearing aid amplification on the contribution of specific frequency bands to overall loudness in adult listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Results for listeners with SNHL were compared with results for listeners with normal hearing (NH) to evaluate whether amplification restores the normal perception of loudness for broadband sound. A secondary aim of this study is to determine whether the loudness perception of new hearing aid users becomes closer to normal over the first few months of hearing aid use. It was hypothesized that amplification would cause the high-frequency bands to contribute most to the perception of loudness and that this effect might decrease as new hearing aid users adapt to amplification.
DESIGN: In experiment 1, 8 adult listeners with SNHL completed a two-interval forced-choice loudness task in unaided and aided conditions. A control group of 7 listeners with NH completed the task in the unaided condition only. Stimuli were composed of seven summed noise bands whose levels were independently adjusted between presentations. During a trial, two stimuli were presented, and listeners determined the louder one. The correlation between the difference in levels for a given noise band on every trial and the listener's response was calculated. The resulting measure is termed the perceptual weight because it provides an estimate of the relative contribution of a given frequency region to overall loudness. In experiment 2, a separate group of 6 new hearing aid users repeated identical procedures on 2 sessions separated by 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Results for listeners with SNHL were similar in experiments 1 and 2. In the unaided condition, perceptual weights were greatest for the low-frequency bands. In the aided condition, perceptual weights were greatest for the high-frequency bands. On average, the aided perceptual weights for listeners with SNHL for high-frequency bands were greater than the unaided weights for listeners with NH. In experiment 2, hearing aid experience did not have a significant effect on perceptual weights.
CONCLUSIONS: The high frequencies seem to dominate loudness perception in listeners with SNHL using hearing aids as they do in listeners with NH. However, the results suggest that amplification causes high frequencies to have a larger contribution to overall loudness compared with listeners with NH. The contribution of the high frequencies to loudness did not change after an acclimatization period for the first-time hearing aid users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29794566      PMCID: PMC6250588          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  27 in total

1.  The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Preliminary evidence of asymmetry in uncomfortable loudness levels after unilateral hearing aid experience: evidence of functional plasticity in the adult auditory system.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro; June H Trotter
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Contributions of individual components to the overall loudness of a multitone complex.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Hongyang Tan; Samar Khaddam; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evidence for adaptive plasticity in elderly monaural hearing aid users.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro; Adam J Walker; Suzanne C Purdy
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  The time course of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  A R Horwitz; C W Turner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Paired comparisons of nonlinear frequency compression, extended bandwidth, and restricted bandwidth hearing aid processing for children and adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Brenda Hoover; Joshua Alexander; Dawna Lewis; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 8.  NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Anna O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-30

9.  Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Joshua Alexander; Marc A Brennan; Brenda Hoover; Judy Kopun; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.