Literature DB >> 33003860

Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Yi Shen1, Donghyeon Yun2, Yi Liu2.   

Abstract

The speech intelligibility index (SII) model was modified to allow individualized parameters. These parameters included the relative weights of speech cues in five octave-frequency bands ranging from 0.25 to 4 kHz, i.e., the band importance function, and the transfer function that allows the SII to generate predictions on speech-recognition scores. A Bayesian adaptive procedure, the quick-band-importance-function (qBIF) procedure, was utilized to enable efficient estimation of the SII parameters from individual listeners. In two experiments, the SII parameters were estimated for 30 normal-hearing adults using Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) sentences at speech levels of 55, 65, and 75 dB sound pressure level (in Experiment I) and for 15 hearing-impaired (HI) adult listeners using amplified IEEE or AzBio sentences (in Experiment II). In both experiments, even without prior training, the estimated model parameters showed satisfactory reliability between two runs of the qBIF procedure at least one week apart. For the HI listeners, inter-listener variability in most estimated SII parameters was larger than intra-listener variability of the qBIF procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33003860      PMCID: PMC7511242          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  69 in total

1.  Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  A M Surprenant; C S Watson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Decision strategies of hearing-impaired listeners in spectral shape discrimination.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment.

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; Graham Naylor; Claus Elberling
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng; Ruth Litovsky; Peter Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Ken W Grant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Variation in spectral-shape discrimination weighting functions at different stimulus levels and signal strengths.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Frequency importance functions for words, sentences, and continuous discourse.

Authors:  R A DePaolis; C P Janota; T Frank
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-08

9.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  T Y Ching; H Dillon; D Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal modulation transfer function for efficient assessment of auditory temporal resolution.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.