Literature DB >> 12822803

Perceptual weights in auditory level discrimination.

Reinier Kortekaas1, Søren Buus, Mary Florentine.   

Abstract

Perceptual weights in level discrimination (also called intensity discrimination) were determined for 3-, 7-, 15-, and 24-component tone complexes with flat spectral envelopes using a correlational paradigm. Each frequency component was randomly and independently perturbed in level oneach presentation. For the target interval, frequency-component levels were additionally increased by the level increment to be detected, deltaL [= 201og10((p + deltap)/p), where p is pressure]. Weights were calculated from the across-trial correlation between the level perturbations for each frequency component and the interval chosen by the listener. Two conditions were investigated: (1) deltaL was equal across frequency components, and (2) deltaL increased progressively across frequency components. For both conditions, data for four listeners usually showed the greatest weight for the highest frequency component. The two-to-four highest frequency components generally were most important for level discrimination. The effect of increasing deltaL progressively with frequency was small and inconsistent. Additional measurements showed that flanking noise maskers designed to mask spread of excitation caused only small and generally unsystematic changes to the weights. Overall, these results indicate that listeners combine information across a wide range of auditory channels to arrive at a decision for level discrimination, but the weighting of channels appears to be suboptimal.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12822803     DOI: 10.1121/1.1570441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contribution of frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds: Tonal and noise stimuli.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Marcin Wróblewski; Robin High
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.

Authors:  Katie M Thrailkill; Marc A Brennan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Perceptual weights for loudness judgments of six-tone complexes.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Daniel L Valente; Suyash N Joshi; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relative contributions of specific frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Sara M Walker; Oluwaseye A Ogun; Brenda Ohlrich; Katyarina E Brunette; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Spectral weights for sample discrimination as a function of overall level.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effect of presentation level on spectral weights for sentences.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spectro-temporal weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Wiebke Heeren; Jan Rennies; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.