Literature DB >> 19173421

Spectral weights for sample discrimination as a function of overall level.

Lori J Leibold1, Hongyang Tan, Walt Jesteadt.   

Abstract

Doherty and Lutfi [(1996). "Spectral weights for overall level discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1053-1058] examined the weights assigned to individual components of a six-tone complex during a sample discrimination task and reported that hearing-impaired subjects gave the most weight to components in the region of their high-frequency hearing loss. In contrast, weighting patterns varied for normal-hearing subjects. In the current study, the same six-tone complex, comprised of the octave frequencies from 0.25 to 8 kHz, was presented to three subjects with normal hearing in high-pass noise, in low-pass noise, and in quiet at two overall levels. Consistent with Doherty and Lutfi, subjects assigned more weight to the 4-kHz component in the high-pass noise condition, but roughly equal weight to all components in the lower-level quiet condition. Weights in the low-pass noise and higher-level quiet conditions, however, were similar to those in the high-pass noise condition. A second experiment compared weights for seven subjects in quiet at four different mean levels. Weights for the highest-frequency components increased as the overall level of the complexes was increased. These results suggest that overall level, rather than degree of hearing loss or sensation level, was the primary cause of the effect that Doherty and Lutfi observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173421      PMCID: PMC2659502          DOI: 10.1121/1.3033741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Perceptual weights in auditory level discrimination.

Authors:  Reinier Kortekaas; Søren Buus; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Robert A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Molecular analysis of the effect of relative tone level on multitone pattern discrimination.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Contributions of individual components to the overall loudness of a multitone complex.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Hongyang Tan; Samar Khaddam; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task.

Authors:  B G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Informational processing of complex sound. I: Intensity discrimination.

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spectral weights for overall level discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  K A Doherty; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spectral shape discrimination by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.

Authors:  Katie M Thrailkill; Marc A Brennan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Perceptual weights for loudness judgments of six-tone complexes.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Daniel L Valente; Suyash N Joshi; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relative contributions of specific frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Sara M Walker; Oluwaseye A Ogun; Brenda Ohlrich; Katyarina E Brunette; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  The effect of presentation level on spectral weights for sentences.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Chloé Langlet; Christian Lorenzi; Diane S Lazard; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Spectro-temporal weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Wiebke Heeren; Jan Rennies; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hearing-Impaired Listeners Show Reduced Attention to High-Frequency Information in the Presence of Low-Frequency Information.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.