Literature DB >> 11931319

Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words.

Gerald A Studebaker1, Robert L Sherbecoe.   

Abstract

A study was carried out to determine the relative importance to speech intelligibility of different intensities within the speech dynamic range. The functions that were derived are analogous to previous descriptions of the relative importance of different frequencies and are referred to here as intensity-importance functions (IIFs). They were obtained as follows. Sharply filtered bands of speech (NU6 monosyllabic words) were mixed with filtered noise and presented alone or in pairs at 19 signal-to-noise ratios (-25 to 41 dB). When paired bands were tested, the level and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of one band were held constant while the level and SNR of the other band were varied. The listeners were 100 normal hearers, organized into five 20-person groups. Each group provided speech recognition data for one of five frequency regions (141-562, 562-1122, 1122-1778, 1778-2818, and 2818-8913 Hz). Comparisons of the results for each group indicated that IIFs vary with frequency and SNR. Current methods for predicting intelligibility from physical measurements of speech audibility would need to be revised in order to take such findings into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11931319     DOI: 10.1121/1.1445788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Enhancing intelligibility of narrowband speech with out-of-band noise: evidence for lateral suppression at high-normal intensity.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 3.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

4.  Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions.

Authors:  Jianfen Ma; Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Processing intensity at rapid rates: evidence from auditory evoked potentials in 9-11-year-old children.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dinces; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09

7.  Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Amanda M Griffin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The noise susceptibility of various speech bands.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Heather L Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Brian R Glasberg; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.