Literature DB >> 25096107

Perceptual weights for loudness judgments of six-tone complexes.

Walt Jesteadt1, Daniel L Valente1, Suyash N Joshi1, Kendra K Schmid2.   

Abstract

Subjects with normal hearing (NH) and with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) judged the overall loudness of six-tone complexes comprised of octave frequencies from 0.25 to 8 kHz. The level of each tone was selected from a normal distribution with a standard deviation of 5 dB, and subjects judged which of two complexes was louder. Overall level varied across conditions. In the "loudness" task, there was no difference in mean level across the two stimuli. In the "sample discrimination" task, the two complexes differed by an average of 5 dB. For both tasks, perceptual weights were derived by correlating the differences in level between matched-frequency tones in the complexes and the loudness decision on each trial. Weights obtained in the two tasks showed similar shifts from low to high frequency components with increasing overall level. Simulation of these experiments using a model of loudness perception [Moore and Glasberg (2004), Hear Res. 188, 70-88] yielded predicted weights for these stimuli that were highly correlated with predicted specific loudness, but not with the observed weights.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25096107      PMCID: PMC4144179          DOI: 10.1121/1.4887478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Perceptual weights in auditory level discrimination.

Authors:  Reinier Kortekaas; Søren Buus; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task.

Authors:  B G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory profile analysis: frequency, phase, and Weber's law.

Authors:  D M Green; C R Mason
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the relations of intensity jnd's to loudness and neural noise.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; H N Jordan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones.

Authors:  B C Moore; K Ohgushi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Relative estimates of combination weights, decision criteria, and internal noise based on correlation coefficients.

Authors:  V M Richards; S Zhu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments.

Authors:  W Jesteadt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

9.  A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spectro-temporal weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Wiebke Heeren; Jan Rennies; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relative contributions of specific frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Sara M Walker; Oluwaseye A Ogun; Brenda Ohlrich; Katyarina E Brunette; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Individual Differences in Behavioural Decision Weights Related to Irregularities in Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Kristen Bond; Christophe Stoelinga; Robert Lutfi; Glenis Long
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Spectral weighting functions for lateralization and localization of complex sound.

Authors:  Monica L Folkerts; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  The effect of presentation level on spectral weights for sentences.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Chloé Langlet; Christian Lorenzi; Diane S Lazard; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Hearing-Impaired Listeners Show Reduced Attention to High-Frequency Information in the Presence of Low-Frequency Information.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.