Literature DB >> 26680769

Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.

Stephanie Hosang1, Jillian Chan2, Shirin Davarpanah Jazi2, Matthew Heath3,4.   

Abstract

Grasping a three-dimensional (3D) object results in the specification of motor output via absolute size information. In contrast, the impoverished visual cues (e.g., binocular and vergence) associated with grasping a two-dimensional (2D) object are reported to render aperture formation via an object's perceptual and relative visual features. It is, however, important to recognize that 3D and 2D grasping differ not only in terms of their visual properties, but also because the latter does not entail the provision of haptic feedback. As such, the present work examined whether haptic feedback influences the nature of the information supporting 2D grasping. Participants grasped differently sized 3D objects (i.e., 3D task) and completed a 'traditional' 2D grasping task to line drawings without receiving haptic feedback (i.e., 2DH- task). As well, we included a separate condition using the same objects as the 2DH- task; however, the experimenter placed a 3D object (i.e., one corresponding to the size of the 2D object) between the thumb and forefinger of participants' grasping limb once they completed their response (i.e., 2DH+ task). Thus, the 2DH+ task provided haptic feedback related to absolute object size. Notably, we computed just-noticeable-difference (JND) scores to determine whether the different tasks adhered to, or violated, the relative psychophysical principles of Weber's law. JNDs for the 2DH- task adhered to Weber's law, whereas 3D and 2DH+ tasks violated the law. Thus, results evince that 2DH- and 2DH+ tasks are specified via relative and absolute object size information, respectively. Accordingly, we propose that haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration and contend that our results highlight the importance of multi-sensory cue integration in goal-directed grasping.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grasping; Haptic feedback; Three-dimensional; Two-dimensional; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26680769     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4521-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?. Two- and three-dimensional targets.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kwok; Oliver J Braddick
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Visual control of action directed toward two-dimensional objects relies on holistic processing of object shape.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

5.  Memory delay and haptic feedback influence the dissociation of tactile cues for perception and action.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Stephanie Hosang; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity.

Authors:  J H Maunsell; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia.

Authors:  David A Westwood; James Danckert; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: repetition effects for pictures versus real objects.

Authors:  Jacqueline C Snow; Charles E Pettypiece; Teresa D McAdam; Adam D McLean; Patrick W Stroman; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis.

Authors:  Antonin Viau; Anatol G Feldman; Bradford J McFadyen; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  How vision affects kinematic properties of pantomimed prehension movements.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Manual estimations of functionally graspable target objects adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Joseph Manzone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Jillian Chan; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-04

4.  Dissociable effects of irrelevant context on 2D and 3D grasping.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Grasping trajectories in a virtual environment adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Sigal Berman; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Joseph Manzone; Michaela Khan; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Grasping Weber's Law in a Virtual Environment: The Effect of Haptic Feedback.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Sigal Berman; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-19

8.  Pantomime-Grasping: Advance Knowledge of Haptic Feedback Availability Supports an Absolute Visuo-Haptic Calibration.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Social modulation of object-directed but not image-directed actions.

Authors:  Jill A Dosso; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.