Literature DB >> 29101720

Dissociable effects of irrelevant context on 2D and 3D grasping.

Aviad Ozana1, Tzvi Ganel2.   

Abstract

Grasping movements directed toward real objects are typically unaffected by irrelevant aspects of the object and its surroundings, indicating that such interactions are based on analytic processing of object shape and size. However, recent findings show that grasping directed toward two-dimensional (2D) objects is subjected to perceptually mediated effects of relative shape and size. It is unclear however, whether context-dependent processing-a hallmark of visual perception-affects 2D grasping in the same fashion. Here, we explored this possibility by comparing the influence of a newly discovered contextual effect on 2D and on 3D grasping. According to the range of standard effect (RSE), the perceptual resolution for a stimulus depends on the range of the other stimuli presented within the same session, with higher resolution obtained under narrow compared to wide context range. In two experiments, participants were asked to grasp 3D and 2D objects embedded in a wide or a narrow range. The results showed that, unlike 3D grasping, which was immune to contextual information, the resolution during 2D grasping was significantly modulated by the range of the irrelevant context. The findings suggest that visuomotor control directed to 2D objects is intruded by irrelevant perceptual information, making it context-dependent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contextual processing; Effect of stimulus range; Object perception; Perception and action; Two-dimensional objects

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29101720     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1443-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  33 in total

Review 1.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Garner-Interference in left-handed awkward grasping.

Authors:  Owino Eloka; Felix Feuerhake; Markus Janczyk; Volker H Franz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-01

3.  Weber's law in grasping.

Authors:  Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Inferences about time course of Weber's Law violate statistical principles.

Authors:  Rachel M Foster; Volker H Franz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Both vision-for-perception and vision-for-action follow Weber's law at small object sizes, but violate it at larger sizes.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Stefano Uccelli; Eva Viviani; Claudio de'Sperati
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape.

Authors:  Tzvi Ganel; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Findings from the Garner-paradigm do not support the "how" versus "what" distinction in the visual brain.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Tzvi Ganel; Gal Namdar; Avigail Mirsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Grasping trajectories in a virtual environment adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Sigal Berman; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping Weber's Law in a Virtual Environment: The Effect of Haptic Feedback.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Sigal Berman; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-19

3.  Social modulation of object-directed but not image-directed actions.

Authors:  Jill A Dosso; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.